Projecting Area and Flux of Hemisphere, Frustum & Cone

stronghold.mr
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
PREVIOUS POST ----https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=165844
THIS POST HELP ME OUT TO SOME EXTENT BUT I AM STILL MESSED UP...

I am messed up with the concept of projection of area of different surfaces and flux through different surfaces...

Please someone explain it with some examples such as -

1. Hemisphere (I AM GETTING --- FLUX = E pi r^2 ) PLEASE CONFIRM
2. Frustum (not getting)
3. Cone (not getting)

we have to find flux through all these surfaces (The field E is uniform)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry about my English ...
- What came in must come out ...
3.
this is your Diagram:
(N.B. the dots in the cone are just to give it shape)

E
-->.../.\
-->../...\
-->./...\ <---- cone
-->/____\___________ <- table

...
E
-->.../!
-->../.!
-->./..! <---- half cone
-->/__! ___________ <- table
you have a triangle so the flux is :(surface of triangle) * (E) = ...
you can work out the same with othe problems .
 
thanks for ur reply

but can u please explain it for frustum and hemisphere

not getting the answer in case of frustum

and please confirm hemisphere one

thanks
 
What is the orientation of the hemisphere ?
attachment.php?attachmentid=26240&d=1275727066.jpg

case 1 :
flux = (surface of semi Circle )*E
or
case 2 :
flux = (surface of a Circle )*E
 

Attachments

  • Flux Problem.JPG
    Flux Problem.JPG
    4 KB · Views: 459
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top