Proof of Gauss's law using coulomb's law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving Gauss's law using Coulomb's law by analyzing the electric field due to a point charge q inside an arbitrary surface S. The electric flux through the surface is derived as Φ = q/(ε0) by integrating the electric field over the solid angle dΩ, which equals 4π for a spherical surface. The confusion arises regarding how the integral of dΩ results in 4π, with clarification that dΩ represents the solid angle subtended by the surface at the charge's location. The integration limits for the angles θ and φ are implied to cover the entire sphere. This discussion highlights the relationship between electric flux and solid angles in the context of Gauss's law.
demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
so my book has a point charge q inside an arbitrary surface S and at a point P on the surface S, the electric field is E = q/4(π)(ε0)(r2). so the flux through S is then dΦ = E * dS = q/4(π)(ε0)(r2) * dS = q/4(π)(ε0) * dScosθ /(r2) = q/4(π)(ε0) * dΩ. then my book takes the integral of both sides and ends up with Φ = q/4(π)(ε0) ∫ dΩ = q/4(π)(ε0) (4π) = q/(ε0).

what i don't understand it how did ∫ dΩ become 4π?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like they're not using an arbitrary surface. S is a sphere of radius r, and dS is a small element of area on the sphere. What's d\Omega in terms of \vartheta and \varphi and what are the integration limits for the two variables?
 
Actually, you can use an arbitrary surface in this derivation.
d\Omega is the solid angle subtended by the surface dS at the point where the charge q is placed.
\intd\Omega is the solid angle subtentded at the charge by the entire surface. it's value is 4\Pi
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top