What is the energy equivalent of a proton-antiproton pair?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dandy9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy equivalent of a proton-antiproton pair using Einstein's equation E=mc^2. The user successfully calculated the energy equivalent of a proton's mass in joules and converted it to electronvolts (eV), obtaining values of 1.5e-10 joules and 939 MeV, respectively. However, they expressed confusion regarding the calculation of the total gamma ray energy required for proton-antiproton pair production. It was clarified that gamma rays can facilitate pair production, and the user was informed that GeV (giga-electronvolt) is a larger energy unit than MeV. The conversation highlights the complexities of particle physics and the importance of understanding concepts like pair production and energy units.
dandy9
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The mass of a proton is 1.67 multiplied by 10-27 kg.

(a) Find the energy equivalent of the proton's mass in joules.
(b) Convert this value to eV.
(c) Find the smallest total g ray energy that could result in a proton-antiproton pair.

Homework Equations


Einstein's famous E=mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured out (a) and (b), but am absolutely clueless as to how to approach (c). What is a "g ray"? Thanks for all your help!

For (a) I got 1.5e-10
For (b) I got 939 MeV
The answer for (c) is in GeV - not really sure what this means either.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A gamma ray? Seems to be the only thing making sense in that context.
 
Hmmm... Okay, thanks. But I'm unclear about what to do with that information.
What if I do E=mc^2 with m being the combined mass of the proton and the antiproton (so really just 2 times the 1.67 etc.) and get that energy, does this get me anywhere? How do I connect that with gamma rays?
 
I don't know which educational level you are so I cannot really judge what's being asked of you. If "g ray" means gamma rays, then the question is either simplistic (to the point of being wrong) or a good deal more complicated than a) and b).

Simplistic version:
Gamma rays, more precisely the photons contained in a gamma ray, at very high energies can "spontaneously" transform into a particle anti-particle pair, usually an electron anti-electron pair (they actually do not do that spontaneously but only in the presence of a reaction partner, but that is exactly the complication I am ignoring here). This process is called pair production http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production" . The same way, a proton anti-proton pair could be produced by a gamma ray (photon). I do think that is the process that your question asks about. I find it a bit advanced to ask for pair production if you never heard about it.

More realistic version: In reality, the reaction partner has to be taken into account. You don't want details about that.

Final remark: Did I understand you correctly that you do not know what "GeV" is? That is giga-electronvolt: 1 GeV = 1000 MeV.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow, thanks! That was really thorough and I understand the question now. Thanks for taking your time to help me! I truly appreciate it!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top