Proton in a uniform electric field

AI Thread Summary
A proton projected into a uniform electric field of -5.80 x 10^5 N/C comes to rest after traveling 6.50 cm. The relationship between the electric force and acceleration is established using qE = ma, leading to an acceleration of -5.556 x 10^13 m/s². The time taken to stop is calculated as approximately 4.8 x 10^-8 seconds, and the initial velocity is found to be 2,666,880 m/s. The confusion arose from misinterpreting the speed of light and the direction of acceleration. The calculations were ultimately confirmed and resolved.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A proton is projected in the positive x direction into a region of uniform electric field E = (-5.80 ✕ 10^5) N/C at t = 0. The proton travels 6.50 cm as it comes to rest.

Find the initial velocity and the time it takes for the proton to stop.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The charge of the proton multiplied by the electric field must equal the mass of the proton times the acceleration

qE=ma

hence

a= (-5.556x10^13)

Constant accelecration, integrate with respect to time to get velocity

V= Vi - 5.556x10^13 t

X= 0 + Vi(t) - 2.2778 t^2

Since initial position = 0.

Using the position function to find the time it takes to stop:

.065m = (5.556x10^13)t^2 - (2.2778x10^13)t^2

solving for t, t= 4.8x10^-8 s

Plugging this back to the velocity equation where at t= 4.8x10^-8 s the final velocity = 0 therefore:

Vi=(5.556x10^13 (m/s^2))(4.8x10^-8 s)

Clearly not right, it's faster than the SOL.
Where am I going wrong?

ps. I don't like to memorize stuff so please don't refer me to the kinematic equations. I prefer to derive them by myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to solve ##v dv = a dx## assuming that ##v = v_i## at ##x = x_0 = 0##.

Or just use ##v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2a \Delta x## to save some time.

Also that acceleration should be positive I think.
 
Last edited:
That's exactly what I did? It doesn't seem to be working. I missed something along the way.

Acceleration can't be positive since it's slowing down and moving in the positive x-direction.
 
Feodalherren said:
That's exactly what I did? It doesn't seem to be working. I missed something along the way.

Acceleration can't be positive since it's slowing down and moving in the positive x-direction.

Ahh so the electric field is in the ##(- \hat i)## direction.

You seem to be solving ##a = \frac{dv}{dt}##.
 
Well yes, but only as an initial step. Once I have that I integrate once more to solve for the position function. I can't see anything wrong with it :/.
 
You can find a relationship between velocity and position because you have the constant acceleration.$$v dv = a dx$$
$$\int_{v_i}^{0} v dv = \int_{0}^{0.065} a dx$$

This let's you solve for the initial velocity. The time taken can now be found from ##a = \frac{dv}{dt}##, or simply use ##v_f = v_i + at##.
 
But that's exactly what I did...
 
Feodalherren said:
But that's exactly what I did...

Look at the integral limits carefully and ask yourself where you went wrong.
 
I honestly have no clue. This is how I did all of my mechanics in Physics I. I never bothered to remember the kinematic equations as just integrating / taking derivatives worked for everything. I'm missing something fundamental.

Why can't I just integrate from acceleration to velocity to position?
 
  • #10
Everything looks correct to me too, I'm not sure then.
 
  • #11
Feodalherren said:
Vi=(5.556x10^13 (m/s^2))(4.8x10^-8 s)

Clearly not right, it's faster than the SOL.
Where am I going wrong?

What numerical value do you get for Vi? And what is the speed of light? :smile:

ehild

Vi≈3*106
 
  • #12
Vi=(5.556x10^13 (m/s^2))(4.8x10^-8 s)= 2,666,880 m/s

... my bad I thought the SOL was about 3 x 10^6 m/s but that's km/s.

Thanks ehild.
 
  • #13
Feodalherren said:
Vi=(5.556x10^13 (m/s^2))(4.8x10^-8 s)= 2,666,880 m/s

... my bad I thought the SOL was about 3 x 10^6 m/s but that's km/s.

Thanks ehild.

No. So what is the SOL? You need to know the magnitude...
3x10^5 km/s = 3x10^8 m/s

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #14
Don't worry about it, I solved it. Thanks again :).
 
Back
Top