Prove Hermitian with two different wave functions

pfollansbee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let ψ(r)= c_n ϕ_n (r) + c_m ϕ_m (r) where ϕ_n(r) and ϕ_m (r) are independent functions.
Show that the condition that  is Hermitian leads to
∫ψ_m (r)^* Âψ_n (r)dr = ∫Â^* ψ_m (r)^* ψ_n (r)dr

Homework Equations



∫ψ(r)^*  ψ(r)dr = ∫Â^* ψ(r)^* ψ(r)dr

The Attempt at a Solution



It is obvious to me that if
<m|\hat A|n> = <\hat A m|n>
then
<m|\hat A|n> = <n|\hat A|m>^*

My professor gave me a hint and said that I need to expand these out and show that they are equal. This is where my problem lies. I have no idea how to expand these out. I have tried a few ways, like setting
\phi _m = (\psi -c_n \phi _n)/c_m
This certainly did not seem like the correct approach to me.

Maybe someone here can give me another hint as to how this goes. I have asked my professor three times to talk to me about it, but he seems content in misunderstanding me and talking about other problems that we have already solved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm no replies... oh well. Here is the solution that I came up with. Just in case anyone else happens to happen upon a similar problem, this may help.
 

Attachments

  • solution.png
    solution.png
    71.1 KB · Views: 478
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top