Prove that f(sqrt(2),-sqrt(2))=-8<f(x,y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pbialos
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the function f(x,y) = x^4 + y^4 - 2(x-y)^2 has absolute minimums at the points (sqrt(2), -sqrt(2)) and (-sqrt(2), sqrt(2)), with the value f(sqrt(2), -sqrt(2)) = -8 being less than f(x,y) for all (x,y). The critical points are identified along the line y = -x, and the participant concludes that there are no local maximums after analyzing the partial derivatives, which vanish at x = -y. The discriminant analysis indicates that the conditions for a local maximum are not satisfied, and any potential critical point at (0,0) is shown to be a saddle point. The participant seeks confirmation of their findings regarding the absence of local maximums.
pbialos
I have an exercise i would really appreciate if you could help me with:

Given f:R^2->R, f(x,y)=x^4+y^4-2(x-y)^2
1-Prove that (sqrt(2),-sqrt(2)) and (-sqrt(2),sqrt(2)) are absolute minimums
2-are there any local maximums?

1-I found out that the critical points lie on the line y=-x, and i suppose i should prove that f(sqrt(2),-sqrt(2))=-8<f(x,y) for every (x,y) but i don't know how to do this.

2-I found that there arent any local maximums, but i would like you to correct me if i am wrong.

Thank you very much, Paul.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2. what are the partial derivatves, where do they vanish and what is the discrominant there? post the working.
 
my work

The partial derivatives are: Fx=4x^3-4(x-y) and Fy=4y^3+4(x-y)
they vanish at x=-y and the discriminant there is 144y^4-96y^2 if my calculations are correct.
Fx and Fy are the partial derivatives with respect to x and y respectively.
What i did next, was to say that if there is a relative maximum at (x,-x):

(a)the discriminant has to be positive and Fxx>0 or
(b)the discriminant has to be equal to 0.

if (a) happens it would mean that Fxx=12x^2-4>0 and discriminant=144y^4-96y^2>0 which is not possible for any point over y=-x.

(b) can only happen if (x,y)=(0,0) but i can prove that it is a saddle point approaching from different directions to (0,0).

So i concluded that there are not relative maximums, is this correct?

If you ask me, i think i can explain it a little bit clearer.
Thank you for your help, Paul.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top