Proving Equations through Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter prace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
prace
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The question asked was to "Show that..." with regards to the equations stated below.


Homework Equations



http://album6.snapandshare.com/3936/45466/862870.jpg

sorry for such a large image... I am not too savvy with the latex yet, so i just linked an image that i created with microsoft word.

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I know I am suppossed to show an attempt at this solution, but I am completely boggled on where to even start. One thing I did try to do for the first equation was to just substitute in values for n starting at 2. This did not really do much for me because as I continued along, the equation just came out to be ln(1-(some number smaller and smaller than 1)).

The only thing I can take out of the second equation is that the series will converge at pi, but I don't see how that is going to help me. I also tried substitute in numbers for n but again, no help there. I did find out however that the series was an alternating series, but I guess that was pretty obvious from the original statement of the problem.

Any help with getting me started with this would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint \sum_k \ln a_k = \ln\prod_k a_k
 
The first series should probably start at 2, but it can not start at 1 because it it does than it is undefined.
 
benorin said:
Hint \sum_k \ln a_k = \ln\prod_k a_k

Hi,

Thanks for the responses. Sorry for the dumb question, but what does the symbol in the right hand side of the equation after the ln mean? I don't think I have seen that one before. :confused: thanks.
 
prace said:
Hi,

Thanks for the responses. Sorry for the dumb question, but what does the symbol in the right hand side of the equation after the ln mean? I don't think I have seen that one before. :confused: thanks.


It's an infinite product.
 
cool thanks, I am going to try and figure it out! I'll be back =)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top