Proving Non-Singular Matrix Product: AI=A-1 & BB-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hard Matrix Proof
thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the product of two (nxn) non-singular matrixes A and B is non singular and that (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well AI = A^{-1)

we could perhaps try asing AA^{-1} and BB^{-1} ??

Hopeless. What type of things do you look for in a question like this! Just quote rules until you get somewhere?

Thanks
Thomas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, can you use determinants in the proof?
 
thomas49th said:
What type of things do you look for in a question like this! Just quote rules until you get somewhere?
That's not unreasonable. A great many problems boil down to little more than citing definitions. If you know what it means to be an inverse, it's almost trivial to check that if B^{-1}A^{-1} is an inverse of (AB).
 
Petek said:
For the first part, can you use determinants in the proof?


If you want to use determinants then you would have to understand the derivation of the product formula for determinants. Otherwise any proof based on that would be pointless. Given the question in the OP, it is unlikely that he is able to write down the proof of the product formula for determinants from scratch.

So, he should either produce a proof without using determinants, or study determinants first (after which the questions he wanted to answer here would become trivial anyway).

Hint for proof without determinants: try to prove that if AB is singular then either A or B must be singular.
 
Non-singular is the same as having an inverse. Is B-1A-1 the inverse of AB? If so, you're done
 
In particular, what is (B-1A-1)(AB)?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top