Raising the Window Washer: A Trickier Problem Than It Looks

  • Thread starter Thread starter SnowOwl18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Window
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenge of calculating the force a window washer must exert to raise herself at a constant speed using a bucket-pulley system. The initial advice suggests that since the acceleration is zero, she only needs to pull her weight, calculated at 604.7 N. However, the problem hints that there are two upward forces acting on her: one from the rope on the basket and another from the rope on her hands. Participants express confusion over the calculations and suggest various adjustments, but none seem to resolve the issue. The complexity of the problem indicates that a deeper understanding of the forces at play is necessary.
SnowOwl18
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Ok, I tried this and even found on this forum that someone asked the same question before, but I tried their advice and the answer was still wrong. The problem is that :
---- A window washer pulls herself upward using the bucket-pulley apparatus ...How hard must she pull downward to raise herself slowly at constant speed? The mass of the person plus the bucket is 61.7kg.----

The advice given on this forum was that since she is moving at a constant speed, the acceleration is zero...so she just needs to pull her (plus the bucket's) weight. I calculated this (W=mg) and got 604.7 N, but the program says I'm wrong. And then it gave a hint : This problem is trickier than it looks. There are two upward forces acting on the girl. One is exerted by the rope on the top of the basket. The other is exerted by the rope on her hands.

So does anyone have any advice on what to do? Much thanks :o)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maybe make it 2N? multiply n times 2... if the rope goes half way around the pulley, its 2N, at least that's what my program says... try that?
 
o like 604.7 times 2? I just tried that and it says it's wrong
 
hrm, maybe I am doing the wrong one then, sheesh, I am gettin so confused lately... sorry i couldn't be of more help
 
lol np, thanks for trying tho! :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top