Calculating Tensions and Acceleration in Frictionless Pulley System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating tensions and acceleration in a frictionless pulley system with weights of 200 N and 300 N. It highlights that the acceleration of block B is half that of block A, which is explained by the constant length of the string. A mathematical proof is provided, showing that the relationship between the accelerations can be derived from the string's configuration. The explanation suggests visualizing the system with a piece of string to better understand the mechanics involved. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the constraints imposed by the pulley system.
Lamoid
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
The weights of the objects are 200 N and 300 N. The pulleys are essentially frictionless and massless. P1 has a stationary axle but P2 is free to move up and down. Find the tensions FT1 and FT2 and the acceleration of each body.

Diagram I made in paint attached.

Now my problem is not that I can't get the right answer but that I don't understand why. It gives me a hint that the acceleration of block B is half (and in the opposite direction of course) that of block A and I cannot not figure out why that is. Can anyone explain it to me?

And yes, the diagram sucks but the A block is moving down, B is moving up.
 

Attachments

  • Physics Question.jpg
    Physics Question.jpg
    9.4 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
You can prove mathematically that the magnitude of the acceleration of A is twice that of B using the fact that the string length remains constant. Divide the string into three pieces: X (from mass A to P1), Y (from P1 to P2), Y (from P2 to the spot of rope at the height of P1). Thus the length of the rope is X + 2Y. Since the length can't change, take the derivative twice to find the acceleration constraint: a_x + 2a_y = 0. Make sense? (a_x is the acceleration of mass A; a_y is the acceleration of mass B)

But even better than proving it is to just play around with a piece of string and see how folding the string in half affects things.
 
Thank you very much! That's a neat calculus proof.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top