Pulley with rotational consideration

  • Thread starter Thread starter endeavor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley Rotational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the linear speed of a descending mass from a pulley using conservation of mechanical energy. The user initially attempted to apply this principle but derived an incorrect formula for velocity. They later found the correct acceleration using a different method and confirmed the speed as 5.8 m/s. The challenge lies in equating the potential energy lost to the kinetic energy gained, including the rotational inertia of the pulley. Despite understanding the energy conservation concept, the user struggles to derive the correct linear speed using the energy approach.
endeavor
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
An object descends from a pulley.
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/9783/physics12qm.th.jpg
Use the conservation of mechanical energy to find the linear speed of the descending mass (m = 1.0kg) after it has descended a vertical distance of 2.0m from rest. (For the pulley, M = 0.30kg and R = 0.15m. Neglect friction and mass of the string)

I solved this question not using the conservation of mechanical energy. At first I tried using it though and I wound up getting:
vcm = square root of (4/3 mgh/M)

However, I determined the acceleration using a pervious example:
a = 2mg/(2m + M)
and then used v2 = 2ax
and got 5.8m/s which is the right answer...

but I don't know how to solve this question using the conservation of mechanical energy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let us take the body pulley Earth as our system. During the following event no external work is done on the system. So the mechanical energy of the system is conserved.
As the block slides an height h, then there is a loss of mgh amount of potential energy. Since there has been no loss of mechanical energy, the following potential energy is converted into Kinetic enegy. So you equate the change in potential energy to the change in Kinetic energy.
 
yes, i understand that part. is kinetic energy in this case equal to:
1/2 Icmw2 + 1/2 Mvcm2
and
I = 1/2MR2
so substituting v/R for w
mgh = 1/4 Mvcm2 + 1/2 Mvcm2

but solving for vcm here does not get me 5.8m/s
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top