Pulleys and Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving pulleys and the conservation of energy, specifically determining the upward acceleration of a mass using energy principles. The user initially sets up a conservation of energy equation but encounters difficulties, suspecting an error in their calculations. Feedback highlights that the accelerations of the two masses differ, with one accelerating at twice the rate of the other. Additionally, it points out a mistake in the conservation of energy equation, suggesting that the total change in kinetic energy and potential energy should equal zero. The user is seeking clarification on these points to correct their approach.
zx95
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
1. In the system shown in the figure, the pulleys on the left and right are fixed, but the pulley in the center can move left or right. The two hanging masses are identical, and the pulleys and ropes are all massless. Find the upward acceleration of the mass on the left, in terms of g.
2. I have to solve this problem using only Conservation of Energy. The following equations are relevant: K = (1/2)mv^2 and U = mgy
25umnaf.jpg

3. I began by setting up a general Conservation of Energy equation.

I'm calling the left mass m1 and the right mass m2
m1 = m2 = m

ΔU1 + ΔU2 + ΔK2 = ΔK1
mgΔy1 + mgΔy2 + (1/2)mv2^2 = (1/2)m1^2

(( v^2 = 2aΔy)) Substitute kinematic equation for velocity

gΔy1 + gΔy2 + aΔy2 = aΔy1

(( Δy1 = -2Δy2)) Substitute Δy1 in terms of Δy2

-2gΔy2 + gΔy2 + aΔy2 = -2aΔy2
-2g + g = -2a - a
-g = -3a
(1/3)g = a

This however, doesn't seem to be correct. Any hints on where I may have gone wrong? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looking at this quickly, a couple of points:
(1) the acceleration of the masses, and hence their speeds, are not the same; one of them accelerates at twice the rate of the other.
(2) Your conservation of energy equation is wrong. It's delta K_total plus delta U_total =0. I'm not sure why you have one of the delta K's on the other side of the equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top