QM expectation value relation <x^n>, <p^n>

sensou
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I need to calculate <x^n> and <p^n> for psi(x)=exp(-ax^2/2)
for n even.
For <x^n>:
<x^n>=integral(exp(-ax^2)*x^n )dx from -inf to +inf
then i use integration by parts to get an infinite series and i use a formula to find the finite sum of the series
=[exp(-ax^2)*x^(n+1)/((n+1-2a*(n+1)^2)] with limits -infinity to +infinity
i don't think this is sufficient as i believe the answer should result in a constant and when i use this to work out <x^2>, i can't get a finite answer. I am not sure of another way to work through this question.

For <p^n> i have shown that for n odd, this vanishes, but for n even i am not sure what the answer is. I would appreciate any help or suggestions on where to start with this question, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a trick...What happens if n=odd integer for \langle \hat{x}^{n} \rangle ...?

Daniel.

P.S. I'm sure you did gaussian integrals in statistical physics seminar.
 
sensou said:
I need to calculate <x^n> and <p^n> for psi(x)=exp(-ax^2/2)
for n even.
For <x^n>:
<x^n>=integral(exp(-ax^2)*x^n )dx from -inf to +inf
then i use integration by parts to get an infinite series and i use a formula to find the finite sum of the series
=[exp(-ax^2)*x^(n+1)/((n+1-2a*(n+1)^2)] with limits -infinity to +infinity
i don't think this is sufficient as i believe the answer should result in a constant and when i use this to work out <x^2>, i can't get a finite answer. I am not sure of another way to work through this question.
I don't see how you can get an *infinite* series!

First, write down the result for the case n=0. Then, consider the case with n=2. after doing integrations by parts, you may write the result in terms of the n=0 expression.

Now do it with n=4 which, after integrations by parts, may be written in terms of the result of n=2. At that point, the generalization should be obvious. The result is of the form "a" raised to a certain power times a factorial term.
 
Thanks for your quick replies. I am now able to get the answer :smile:
I should have done it that way from the start but for some reason that infinite series thing led me on a bit.
Thanks for all the help.
 
I just realized that i haven't been able to get the <p^n> part right where p=-i(h-bar)d/dx
i get <p^2>=(h-bar)^2 *a/2*sqrt(pi/a)
<p^4>=(-3/4)*(h-bar)^4 *a^2*sqrt(pi/a)
<p^6>=(-165/8)*(h-bar)^6 *a^4*sqrt(pi/a)
<p^8>=(4605/16)*(h-bar)^8 *a^6*sqrt(pi/a)
And this doesn't give me a nice relationship for <p^n>
i realize that p^n where n is odd =0.
I think i must have done something wrong with the maths somewhere, but i can't find where. And i am 90% sure that the <p^2> is correct but i don't know about the others.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top