QM: Hamiltonians and energies of a system

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given known data
Hi all.

Lets I have a system, whose Hamiltonian is given by H = p_1 + p_2, where pi is the momentum of i, where this i can be whatever, e.g. momentum in some particular direction. When the Hamiltonian is given on this form, do I know for certain that the eigenenergies of the system are on the form:

<br /> E_{m,n} = f(m) + g(n),<br />

where f and g are two functions that depend on respectively m and n? I.e. I am wondering if the eigenenergies of the system follow the same form as the Hamiltonian.

I hope you can help.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
Lets I have a system, whose Hamiltonian is given by H = p_1 + p_2,

Shouldn't your Hamiltonian be quadratic in the momenta? Or are you doing relativistic QM in natural units?

When the Hamiltonian is given on this form, do I know for certain that the eigenenergies of the system are on the form:

<br /> E_{m,n} = f(m) + g(n),<br />

Yes, because Hamiltonians are linear operators. (Perhaps I should say that this can be done whenever the Hamiltonian is linear. I'm not sure if you can cook up a nonlinear one).
 
Tom Mattson said:
Shouldn't your Hamiltonian be quadratic in the momenta?.

Yes, it should. Sorry for that.
Tom Mattson said:
Yes, because Hamiltonians are linear operators. (Perhaps I should say that this can be done whenever the Hamiltonian is linear ...

Hmm, can this be seen from the following?

<br /> H \psi = E\psi \quad \Rightarrow \quad H_1 \psi + H_2\psi = E_1\psi + E_2\psi = E\psi.<br />

Thanks for taking the time to reply.
 
Yes. So here E=E_1+E_2.
 
I've thought about this for the last couple of days. What I have found out is that I believe the above only works if the wavefunction satisfies <br /> \psi(x_1,x_2) = \psi_1(x_1) \psi_2(x_2), so it separates Schrödingers time-independent equation. Do you agree?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top