QM: position and spin dependent potential

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spin 1/2 particle of mass m is described by the Hamiltonian: H = p^2/(2m) + 1/2 mw^2 x^2 + g * x * sigma_x, where sigma_x is one of the Pauli matrices.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to start. It's obvious that the harmonic oscillator part of H should be multiplied by unit matrix. Does this mean that I need to diagonalize the whole matrix H? That would give me two eigenvalues containing operators p and x. When I solve the two equations, I should get the energies for spin up and spin down? I'm not certain is it ok to mix the spin and position variables in such a way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the wavefunction as a two-component vector

\begin{pmatrix} \psi_+(x) \\ \psi_-(x) \end{pmatrix}.
 
Yes, that's exactly what I did and it leads to the following equations:
(\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_+)\Psi_+ + gx\Psi_-=0 \qquad<br /> (\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_-)\Psi_- + gx\Psi_+=0

Now, for this system to be consistent, it's necessary for the determinant to vanish. But here the coefficients are not numbers but operators! I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to calculate the determinant of an operator?
 
Heirot said:
Yes, that's exactly what I did and it leads to the following equations:
(\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_+)\Psi_+ + gx\Psi_-=0 \qquad<br /> (\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E_-)\Psi_- + gx\Psi_+=0

Now, for this system to be consistent, it's necessary for the determinant to vanish. But here the coefficients are not numbers but operators! I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to calculate the determinant of an operator?

You still want to solve

H \psi = E \psi,

so don't introduce E_\pm at this point. I was a bit hasty to introduce \psi_\pm. Things will be cleaner if you use (\Psi_1, \Psi_2), since we're not working in the basis that diagonalizes \sigma_x. All together, we'll have

(\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E)\Psi_1 + gx\Psi_2=0 \qquad<br /> (\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2-E)\Psi_2 + gx\Psi_1=0.

Don't worry about any determinants yet, just consider the sum and difference of these equations and find the spectrum. The determinant of those equations is zero whenever E=E_\pm, the energy eigenvalues, so it's consistent.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top