Quantum Mechanics - Ladder Operators

Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to show that N=a^\dagger a and K_r=\frac{a^\dagger^r a^r}{r!} commute. So basically I need to show [a^\dagger^r a^r,a^\dagger a]=0. I'm not quite sure what to do, I've tried using [a,a^\dagger] in a few places but so far haven't had much success.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tangent87 said:
I'm trying to show that N=a^\dagger a and K_r=\frac{a^\dagger^r a^r}{r!} commute. So basically I need to show [a^\dagger^r a^r,a^\dagger a]=0. I'm not quite sure what to do, I've tried using [a,a^\dagger] in a few places but so far haven't had much success.

What's [AB,CD] equal to?
 
latentcorpse said:
What's [AB,CD] equal to?

Ah, thanks latentcorpse!

[AB,CD]=A[B,CD]+[A,CD]B=A[B,C]D+AC[B,D]+[A,C]DB+C[A,D]B

Also, if I want to show \sum_{r=0}^\infty (-1)^r K_r=|0><0| is it sufficient to show \sum_{r=0}^\infty (-1)^r K_r|n>=|0><0|n>=0?
 
redundant
 
Tangent87 said:
Ah, thanks latentcorpse!

[AB,CD]=A[B,CD]+[A,CD]B=A[B,C]D+AC[B,D]+[A,C]DB+C[A,D]B

Also, if I want to show \sum_{r=0}^\infty (-1)^r K_r=|0><0| is it sufficient to show \sum_{r=0}^\infty (-1)^r K_r|n>=|0><0|n>=0?

No wait of course it's not, what am I thinking!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top