Question about design active filter

  • Thread starter Thread starter samaaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Filter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the design of a low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 200 Hz and a fourth-order configuration. The proposed method involves using four first-order stages, which results in a significant gain reduction at the cutoff frequency. Experts suggest that for a sharper response, second-order stages should be utilized instead, as they can achieve a higher quality factor (Q). The initial approach is deemed incorrect due to the low gain at the desired frequency, and participants recommend studying established filter design principles or using online calculators for better results. Overall, a deeper understanding of filter design is encouraged for effective implementation.
samaaa
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
hi:

i designed an active low-pass filter,but i don't know if it correct method or not

i want fc=200 Hz and n(order)=4. i use this method:

Active_lowpass_filter.png

by let C=100 nF and use this equation "fc=1/(2*pi*C*R1)"
i get R1= 8 Kohm,R2=R1
this is for one stage

to get filter of 4 order,i repeat that stage 4 times
http://uploadpic.org/storage/2011/M3Oveluhfm4grO0dEPhZiUv.png


so is this method correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You show four stages, each of 1st order. That will work for an overdamped system (low Q), but if you are designing for a sharp Q (lower damping and with overshoot in its step response), then you'll have to use 2nd order stages. Each comprises 2 capacitors and 2 resistors (at least), and can provide a high Q response (i.e., Q greater than 0.707). In practice, the professional designer faces a bewildering choice, each offering its own set of pros and cons. But for an introduction to the topic there are a few well-tried classics. Any general second-order filter stage will do the job nicely; you'll need two stages.
 
samaaa said:
i want fc=200 Hz and n(order)=4. i use this method:
...
so is this method correct?

No, because your first order filter has a gain of 0.5 at fc=200 Hz.

When you put the four filters in series, the gain at 200 Hz will be ##0.5^4## = 0.0625.

We don't know how much you already know about filter design, so it's hard to give much advice beyond "get a textbook and study it".

You could try Google for "design a low-pass Butterworth filter" (which seems to be what you were trying to do) but you might need to study some more basic ideas first.
 
NascentOxygen & AlephZero thank you very much
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top