1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Question makes no sense, but should be simple

  1. May 29, 2010 #1
    1. There is a circular disk with a string wrapped around its center. We attached a mass to the string, and the force caused it to rotate. Now, the hypothetical question is "The hanging mass m is exerting a constant downward force of magnitude mg on our system. What would happen to the angular acceleration of our system if the hanging mass were removed and replaced by a constant downward force of equal magnitude, but with no associated mass?"



    2. Relevant equationsNet Torque=Ia
    I=mr^2
    sum of force=mg-T=ma



    3. The attempt at a solution My first instinct was to say that nothing would change because the force would stay the same, but now I think that the angular acceleration would increase, because the lack of any associated mass would cause the inertia to decrease. Any help guys?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 29, 2010 #2

    rock.freak667

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I'd say your first instinct is right.

    Remember, it is the sum of forces being considered. You don't consider the mass 'm' alone, you consider the weight 'mg'. So essentially, you are replacing the weight (a force) with a similar downward force with the same magnitude.
     
  4. May 29, 2010 #3
    That's what I was thinking, but that equation applies to translational acceleration, and this equation deals with angular acceleration. For that, we use the equation torque=Inertia*angular acceleration, right? Wouldn't the loss of a mass (even if its force remains) simply reduce inertia, and thus, increase angular acceleration?
     
  5. May 29, 2010 #4

    rock.freak667

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Wouldn't it work out the same way if you take moments about the disk?

    mgr-Tr= Iα
    with I being the mass moment of inertia of the disk.
     
  6. May 29, 2010 #5
    Are you saying it would just even out on both sides of the equation?
     
  7. May 30, 2010 #6
    Perhaps there is another way to consider the problem without the details of the disk. In one case energy goes into rotating the disk plus the kinetic energy of the mass. In the second case only the disk gains kinetic energy.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Question makes no sense, but should be simple
Loading...