Question regarding Atomic Structure (orbits)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a question about atomic structure and the calculation of electron orbits. The original poster is advised that their method for calculating the number of revolutions is incorrect, as they are mistakenly using the reciprocal of the wavelength instead of a dimensionless counting number. Participants suggest referring to textbook equations for the electron's speed and orbit radius to derive the correct period and number of cycles in a specified time frame. They emphasize the importance of calculating the wavelength and frequency accurately to obtain the correct answer. The original poster acknowledges their initial mistake and appreciates the detailed explanations provided.
Sanosuke Sagara
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I have my doubt,solution and question in the attachment that followed.Thanks for anybody that spend some time on this question.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
It's only a coincidence that you got the right number for part (a). The fact that using the same procedure for part (b) gives the wrong answer, is a good indicator that you are using the wrong procedure.

Your problem is that you are calculating 1 / \lambda which is not a number of revolutions. It's simply the reciprocal of the wavelength, with units of 1/meters. The answer you need doesn't have any units; it's just a "counting" number.

I suggest that you look in your textbook for equations related to the speed v of the electron in an orbit with quantum number n, and the radius r of that orbit. If you know those quantities, you can calculate the time the electron takes for one orbit (the period, T), and from that, the number of orbits it makes in 10^{-8} seconds.
 
Ok first of all, calculate the wavelength emitted , in the same way you have calculated in your doc-attachment.then calculate the velocity of the electron in n=2 , i hope you can do that.
then v= (frequency) (wavelength)
calculate frequency with the above formula , this will be give you cycles /sec

Now you want cycles in 10^-8 seconds , use unitary method.I am getting the correct answer.
 
Yes your both are right and I admit that I just have the 'luck' getting the first answer right and not the second.Thanks for your both detail explanation,jtbell and Dr.Brain,I really appreciate it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top