Questions of single slit diffraction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a single slit diffraction problem from a practice midterm, specifically focusing on the phasor diagram and intensity calculation in part 1b. The main issue raised is the calculation of the angle between phasors, with the original solution suggesting an angle of pi/3, which the poster disputes, arguing it should be derived from the total phase difference divided by the number of phasors minus one. The poster believes that the correct approach would yield an angle of 5pi/12 for the phasors, complicating the intensity calculation. Clarification is sought on the concept of assigning phase angles to phasors based on the center of each slit region. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately determining phase relationships in diffraction problems.
toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have a question on a practice midterm my professor sent out. I would ideally ask him, but I won't see him until itake my midterm. Instead I am attaching the question and solutions at attachments. THe question of interest is in the attachment "physics question" and the solution from the professor on "physics answer"

The question I have a problem with is number 1b. (part b of the first problem). The part that asks you to draw a phasor diagram and and asks you what the intensity is.

Homework Equations



look below

The Attempt at a Solution



They said the total phase difference beta (the angle between the first and last phasor) is 5pi/3. so \beta = \frac{5\pi}{3}

Next they say that because there are 5 phasors, the angle between each phasor is pi/3 (because B/5 is pi/3). I don't think that's right. Suppose you only had 2 phasors... the angle between the 2 phasors ISNT B/2 (or 5pi/6) ...its 5pi/3 because there's only 2 phasors, the angle between them is the same as the angle between the first and last vector. I think the correct formula for the angle between phasor is Beta/(n-1) where n is the number of phasors. Thus I think the angle between each phasor is 5pi/12, which makes drawing them slightly more complicated and finding the intensity though the diagram much more complicated.

If I am wrong, can someone correct me and tell me why?
 

Attachments

  • physics question.jpg
    physics question.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 412
  • physics answer.jpg
    physics answer.jpg
    62.8 KB · Views: 381
Physics news on Phys.org
toesockshoe said:
Suppose you only had 2 phasors... the angle between the 2 phasors ISNT B/2 (or 5pi/6) ...its 5pi/3 because there's only 2 phasors, the angle between them is the same as the angle between the first and last vector.

When approximating the contribution of one region of the slit by one phasor, it seems reasonable to assign a phase angle for that phasor to correspond to the phase angle for a ray at the center of the region. If so, then when you are considering the angle between one phasor and the next phasor, you are considering the phase shift between the center of one region and the center of the next region.
 
TSny said:
When approximating the contribution of one region of the slit by one phasor, it seems reasonable to assign a phase angle for that phasor to correspond to the phase angle for a ray at the center of the region. If so, then when you are considering the angle between one phasor and the next phasor, you are considering the phase shift between the center of one region and the center of the next region.
im not sure what you mean center of the region. can you elaborate?
 
The picture below shows a single slit divided into 5 sections. The light that goes through one region and heads toward the screen at a certain angle is represented by one blue ray which is drawn at the center of the region (red dot). Each blue ray can be represented by a single phasor. The phase difference between two consecutive blue rays determines the angle between two consecutive phasors.
 

Attachments

  • Single Slit.png
    Single Slit.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 445
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top