Is Multiplying Both Sides by -1 Necessary for Solving Differential Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kdinser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diff eq
AI Thread Summary
Multiplying both sides of a differential equation by -1 is not necessary for solving it, as both forms of the solution are valid. The discussion highlights that the rearrangement of terms, such as in the example provided, is primarily for aesthetic purposes and to simplify the expression. The constant C remains unchanged regardless of the form of the solution. Ultimately, both solutions satisfy the same differential equation, making the choice of format a matter of preference. Simplifying expressions by reducing negatives can enhance clarity in mathematical presentations.
kdinser
Messages
335
Reaction score
2
I'm pretty sure I know the answer to this, just want to double check.

For the problems that I'm currently working on, we are just solving the problems for an unknown constant C.

I just finished one were I came up with
\frac{x^2}{2}-y^2cos x-xy^3=C

The book shows the solution as
y^2cos x+xy^3-\frac{x^2}{2}=C

Because C is an arbitrary, unknown constant, did they just multiply both sides by -1? Is there some reason for doing this other then getting rid of 2 negatives in the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's irrelevant which solution u chose,u can verify that both satisfy the same diff.eq.,the one which u were supposed to solve.In general,a smaller number of minuses is preferable.Par éxample:
x+y=4
would u like it more than
-x-y=-4

??

Daniel.
 



Yes, you are correct. The solution shown in the book is just the same as yours, but with the terms rearranged. Multiplying both sides by -1 is just a way to make the solution look neater and more organized. There is no specific reason for doing this other than simplifying the expression and getting rid of the negatives. As long as the constant C remains the same, both solutions are valid.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top