I Quiz question: Who Dies If 'E' Pushes The Stone?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quiz
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a hypothetical scenario involving a notched stone and its potential impact on characters labeled A, B, C, and D. Participants analyze the physics of the situation, suggesting that A is most likely to be hit while the stone could potentially roll through without harming others. The conversation includes considerations of momentum and kinetic energy, with emphasis on how the stone's design affects its trajectory. Calculations related to the stone's circumference and the distance of the hypotenuse are also mentioned as a means to further understand the dynamics at play. Overall, the thread explores the implications of physics in determining who might be harmed by the stone's movement.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31131486_10155149285526260_4418766605865975808_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=53840620f886c5dab249cc2a8ff1010b&oe=5B4E8CA6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
swampwiz said:
https://scontent-arn2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31131486_10155149285526260_4418766605865975808_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=53840620f886c5dab249cc2a8ff1010b&oe=5B4E8CA6
What is your answer and why?
 
russ_watters said:
What is your answer and why?

I think that if anything, A gets hit, but the stone could roll all the way through (besides, A could duck). I'm presuming that the notch fits perfectly over D, and there would be only horizontal momentum going to the seesaw, and with the other stone being heavier (i.e., no notch), it would not crush C, and would vault over the other stone (because of the kinetic energy), clearing B as well.
 
swampwiz said:
I think that if anything, A gets hit, but the stone could roll all the way through (besides, A could duck). I'm presuming that the notch fits perfectly over D, and there would be only horizontal momentum going to the seesaw, and with the other stone being heavier (i.e., no notch), it would not crush C, and would vault over the other stone (because of the kinetic energy), clearing B as well.

To start it off, there is probably a way to calculate the circumference of that notched stone. Then calculate the distance of that hypotenuse.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top