Radii of Curvature for Separating CO2 with 12C and 14C

  • Thread starter Thread starter negat1ve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Curvature
AI Thread Summary
To separate singly charged CO2 isotopes 12C and 14C, the radius of curvature can be calculated using the formula r = mv/qB. The charge q for the CO2 ion is typically one elementary charge (e) since it is singly charged. The mass of the isotopes will differ, with 12C being lighter than 14C, leading to different radii of curvature in a magnetic field. The discussion clarifies that only the additional charge for ionization is considered, which is one electron charge. Understanding these principles allows for effective separation of the isotopes based on their mass differences.
negat1ve
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the same device to separate singly charged CO2 having 12C and 14C. What are the radii of curvature?

This is a follow up question based on a HW problem I answered last week. The original problem was this:

A doubly charged helium atom is accelerated by a voltage 2700V. What will be its radius of curvature if it moves in a plane perpendicular to a uniform 0.340-T field?

Homework Equations



r = mv/qB

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved the original problem by saying
q = 2e for the doubly charged He

On accelerating through V volts
1/2mv^2 = qV = (2e)V

Where v = velocity acquired
v = squrt(4eV/m) = 2*squrt(eV/m)

I figured out the mass to be m = 7.26 x 10^-26kg

And then plugging into the formula.

Now this new follow up question is throwing me off a little bit. Based on the question asked and info given how would you separate the CO2? And what would be the charge q of the CO2? I am thinking it would be the 6e from C + 8e(2) of O2 = 22e. Is this correct? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No it's only the extra charge you put on to isonise it - generally just one e-
 
mgb_phys said:
No it's only the extra charge you put on to isonise it - generally just one e-

Oh ok I get it now. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top