Radius of core, using densities

  • Thread starter Thread starter bocobuff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Radius
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the radius of a planet's core made of iron, given its average density and total radius, the mass equations for the planet and its components must be established. The volume of the planet is the sum of the volumes of the core and the mantle, leading to a relationship between their densities and volumes. By substituting the volume of the mantle into the mass equation, one can isolate the volume of the core. The radius of the core can then be determined using the formula for the volume of a sphere. The final calculated core radius is approximately 3065 km, which raises questions about its proportion relative to the planet's total radius.
bocobuff
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A planet with R=4000km and \rhoavg=5g/cm3. The planet is made of quartz all the way to the core, which is made of iron. The densities of quart and iron are \rhoquartz=2.65g/cm3 and \rhoiron=7.874g/cm3. Calculate the radius of the core.


Homework Equations


\rho=M/V
Vsphere=4/3\pir3


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for Mplanet=\rhoavg=5g/cm3*4/3\pi4000km and got 1.34*1027g. Then with assuming the Mplanet=MTot. Qrtz+MTot. Iron, I tried using various substitutions of my unknowns and I can't get anywhere close to being able to solve for any of them. I know it's some simple calculus, but I am lost and don't remember how to do this. The biggest problem for me is that the radius is cubed and I forgot what to do to solve for that.
Any fresh ideas would help a lot.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The volume of the planet is equal to the volume of the core plus the volume of the mantle.
That's one equation. Then you have your mass equation.
From these two you can substitute for the volume of the mantle to find the volume of the core and thus arrive at core radius.
 
So after a bunch of substitutions and algebra solving for Vcore, I got
Vcore=(\rhoavg*V\rhoplanet - \rhomantle*Vplanet) / (\rhocore - \rhomantle) and got 1.206*1026g/cm3.
Solving for the radius I got
r=\sqrt[3]{V<sub>core</sub>/(4pi/3)} and got 3.0665*108cm which is 3065km, roughly 75% of the planet's r. Sound right?
 
No I don't think so...

VolumePlanet = VolumeMantle + VolumeCore

now

VolumeMantle = VolumePlanet - VolumeCore

so substituing

VolumePlanet = (VolumePlanet - VolumeCore) + VolumeCore

Now why did we do that? Because if we now multiply the volumes by the densities to get the masses, things are much more interesting...

VolumePlanet * DensityAverage= ((VolumePlanet - VolumeCore) * DensityMantle) + (VolumeCore * DensityCore)

Now we know all those numbers except VolumeCore. We are on our way...

I've probably given you too much help but I couldn't see any other way.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top