What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

In summary, the conversation consists of various discussions about documentaries, the acquisition of National Geographic by Fox, a funny manual translation, cutting sandwiches, a question about the proof of the infinitude of primes, and a realization about the similarity between PF and PDG symbols. The conversation also touches on multitasking and the uniqueness of the number two as a prime number.
  • #526
Thank you everyone for support :-) I feel better now :-)
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky, Ibix and 1oldman2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #527
ProfuselyQuarky said:
(I don't like violent notions, but had to laugh at it :sorry:)
Kind of like a Freudian slip. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky
  • #528
It's "weird" to me that strangers in your culture can tap or pat people's shoulders freely. In mine, those who do so to me at night should be gang i.e "Hey yo show me your wallet".
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky
  • #529
1oldman2 said:
Kind of like a Freudian slip. :smile:
:oldlaugh: :ok:
Pepper Mint said:
It's "weird" to me that strangers in your culture can tap or pat people's shoulders freely. In mine, those who do so to me at night should be gang i.e "Hey yo show me your wallet".
It curious how the way some people talk/behave give different people different impressions. Of course, it's cultural and depends on the way a person's been brought up, but even within the same school, the variety of language is extraordinary.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint and 1oldman2
  • #530
Sophia said:
After I repeated, he got angry and told me he wasn't going to bite me and that he had a daughter older than me.
You should have asked him if she has told him not to touch her that way also. :oldtongue:
Sophia said:
Than he left obviously annoyed and angry.
I have found that the people who get the most upset in these situations are usually the most guiltly. Pat yourself on the back for putting him in his place. You earned it.
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #531
Pepper Mint said:
It's "weird" to me that strangers in your culture can tap or pat people's shoulders freely. In mine, those who do so to me at night should be gang i.e "Hey yo show me your wallet".
There are indeed big differences in personal space in various cultures. And then individual differences.
Paradoxically, I enjoy physical contact with close people who I trust. It's my primary or secondary language of love, if you read a book Five languages of love by Gary Chapman. It's a very interesting work. I don't know how accurate it is, but I generally find that there might be some truth in it. It proved effective in some situations in my life.

Here's more about his theory https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Five_Love_Languages
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint
  • #532
All of us are married!
 
  • #533
I fell for it again. This place selling Indian food at 50% for lunch. I have a tasty, albeit smallish-sized meal.
I then look at other dinner's (eating at regular price) plates/servings, all of which are...twice as large as the ones in my plate, AKA,
pay only 50%...and get only 50% of the full portion..
 
  • #534
WWGD said:
I fell for it again. This place selling Indian food at 50% for lunch. I have a tasty, albeit smallish-sized meal.
I then look at other dinner's (eating at regular price) plates/servings, all of which are...twice as large as the ones in my plate, AKA,
pay only 50%...and get only 50% of the full portion..
After all I've read (and seen) about obesity in the states, this sounds reasonable to me.
 
  • #535
WWGD said:
pay only 50%...and get only 50% of the full portion..
Ah - the good old "buy one for the price of two and get one free!" trick.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #536
fresh_42 said:
After all I've read (and seen) about obesity in the states, this sounds reasonable to me.
I have just one large meal a day, trying to save $ , and they are cheating people in the process.
 
  • #537
1oldman2 said:
Nope, not at all. The person doing the touching was obviously more comfortable with the hands on approach, but that's only half of the people involved. He shouldn't expect random strangers to appreciate that type of conduct.
May have been a good thing to tell Dubya re the Merkel massage.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #538
WWGD said:
May have been a good thing to tell Dubya re the Merkel massage.
Touche'
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #539
Have you ever felt that we sometimes act in opposite way to the other person we're with?
For my example, I experience things like becoming braver around afraid people and step up to protect them, and get unreasonably childish when I'm around close friend who's more mature. Is there already scientific explanation behind this?

And then, this might be out of context, but I find myself being aware of my eating manner from time to time-- I also noticed that I'm more relaxed and unaware when there's someone next to me who eat more 'elegantly'. This is especially bothering me since I want to eat peacefully, but somehow I became aware of how I eat. Is this normal?
 
  • #540
shadowshed said:
Have you ever felt that we sometimes act in opposite way to the other person we're with?
For my example, I experience things like becoming braver around afraid people and step up to protect them, and get unreasonably childish when I'm around close friend who's more mature. Is there already scientific explanation behind this?
You're right. It happens pretty often. If anyone's ever studied it, it would have been under the aegis of psychology. However, I haven't personally seen anyone offer a term or explanation for it, that I can recall.
 
  • #541
shadowshed said:
Have you ever felt that we sometimes act in opposite way to the other person we're with?
For my example, I experience things like becoming braver around afraid people and step up to protect them, and get unreasonably childish when I'm around close friend who's more mature. Is there already scientific explanation behind this?

And then, this might be out of context, but I find myself being aware of my eating manner from time to time-- I also noticed that I'm more relaxed and unaware when there's someone next to me who eat more 'elegantly'. This is especially bothering me since I want to eat peacefully, but somehow I became aware of how I eat. Is this normal?

I can't say for sure if this is what you mean, but it might be related to humans' innate social dominance hierarchy -- the attempt of humans, like many other social animals, to form a "pecking order," so to speak.

It's not my area of expertise, so I hesitate to comment on it more than that.

This topic is probably worthy of its own thread. Maybe we can get some sociologists and/or cultural anthropologists to participate (and maybe even some zoologists thrown in for comparisons within the animal kingdom).
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #542
I have a new favorite of German words that made it into foreign languages: Zugzwang. (Just seen at the start of a US movie.)
 
  • #543
Media in the modern age - you don't get what you don't pay for.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #544
zoobyshoe said:
You're right. It happens pretty often. If anyone's ever studied it, it would have been under the aegis of psychology. However, I haven't personally seen anyone offer a term or explanation for it, that I can recall.

Ah, thanks. It helps that other people are actually experiencing it.

collinsmark said:
I can't say for sure if this is what you mean, but it might be related to humans' innate social dominance hierarchy -- the attempt of humans, like many other social animals, to form a "pecking order," so to speak.

It matches with the Interpersonal Complementary section well.. Thank you very much for telling me that!

============
On other random thoughts, do roaches have ears? I wonder if they can listen to sound. If they can, then in what frequency band?
Because I can't help sometimes yell to scare them off. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #545
How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
 
  • #546
zoobyshoe said:
How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
If I remember correctly it has been Nobel himself who recognized that it helps him with his heart problems. But I'm not absolutely sure. What is certain is, that it has been at a time when people swallowed a lot of dubious substances as modern pharmacology was yet to start.
 
  • #547
zoobyshoe said:
How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
Then what do you mean by a "bad" heart ?
This type of nitrate does have its good effect on widening our blood vessels. So the blood flow in them becomes smoother, uhm yeah. And I think it will probably have a bad effect on those with brain injuries instead though.
 
  • #548
zoobyshoe said:
How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
See the "History" section of the Wikipedia entry on nitroglycerin.
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #549
Jonathan Scott said:
See the "History" section of the Wikipedia entry on nitroglycerin.
Thanks.

One link lead to another and I got to the original paper:

http://site.hmc.org.qa/heartviews/vol8no3/PDF/HISTORYOFMEDICINE2.pdf

It strikes me as sheer quackery that succeeded by pure accident. He started experimenting with ingesting it to disprove the powerful unpleasant effects a previous writer had reported. When he found out it had the same unpleasant effects on himself, and anyone else he gave it to, he decided to start prescribing it for conditions he had no clear treatment for.
 
  • #550
zoobyshoe said:
One link lead led to another and I got to the original paper:

past tense ? fixed it fer ya...
Pepper Mint said:
This type of nitrate does have its good effect on widening our blood vessels. So the blood flow in them becomes smoother, uhm yeah. And I think it will probably have a bad effect on those with brain injuries instead though.

I'll attest nitro sure helps a struggling heart
and it does give a headache..
 
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky and Pepper Mint
  • #551
Grand-daughter, nine, sure increased her prowess at swimming this last week in our lake.
Went from just a couple yards of dog paddle to fifty feet, still dog paddling with arms but good leg kicking,
she's almost ready to put face under water .
Have two days left to advance her to breast stroke, hyping it as "Frog Paddle"
and she tried out the kayak...
it's good for them to succeed.
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint and Sophia
  • #552
jim hardy said:
Grand-daughter, nine, sure increased her prowess at swimming this last week in our lake.
Went from just a couple yards of dog paddle to fifty feet, still dog paddling with arms but good leg kicking,
she's almost ready to put face under water .
Have two days left to advance her to breast stroke, hyping it as "Frog Paddle"
and she tried out the kayak...
it's good for them to succeed.
I'm sure she enjoys the time spent with her grand dad. And once she'll be thankful to you for teaching her to swim :-) same as it was something very special for me when my grandpa taught me to ride a bike.
There's something unique about the bond between grandchildren and grandparents if the relationships in the family are healthy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #555
Sophia said:
That's interesting, never heard of Oxford comma before. In fact, I would assume that a comma before "and" is a mistake. I'll be wiser now!
I think I like Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty, and also find myself interested in other pop stars. :DD
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #556
Sophia said:
That's interesting, never heard of Oxford comma before. In fact, I would assume that a comma before "and" is a mistake. I'll be wiser now!
Just to be clear, a comma before "and" is a mistake (or, at least, unnecessary) when you have only two things. It becomes necessary with three or more things (a list) to avoid the sort of confusion that comes from constructions like, "I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty."
 
  • Like
Likes Sophia
  • #557
zoobyshoe said:
Just to be clear, a comma before "and" is a mistake (or, at least, unnecessary) when you have only two things. It becomes necessary with three or more things (a list) to avoid the sort of confusion that comes from constructions like, "I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty."
My difficulty arises from the fact, that it would be an error in my language. It would only be mandatory, if it was followed by a complete sentence and thus changes the subject.
The distinction between two and more listed objects sounds somehow not logic (to me).
 
  • #558
zoobyshoe said:
Just to be clear, a comma before "and" is a mistake (or, at least, unnecessary) when you have only two things. It becomes necessary with three or more things (a list) to avoid the sort of confusion that comes from constructions like, "I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty."
I don't think it's so easy. Consider a modification of your list: "I love my mum, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty", which is unambiguous. If I put in an Oxford comma I get: "I love my mum, Lady Gaga, and Humpty Dumpty". That can be read as stating that my mum is Lady Gaga.

Edit: I agree that a comma is unnecessary for a two-element list. Care is necessary when it is possible to read a sub-list as an expansion of the elements preceding it.

I think.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #559
fresh_42 said:
My difficulty arises from the fact, that it would be an error in my language. It would only be mandatory, if it was followed by a complete sentence.
The distinction between two and more listed objects sounds somehow not logic (to me).
Same here. Rule that there should never be a comma before "and" is one of the first grammar rules we learn (unless there's an exception, of course :-p).
I confess that I haven't studied use of comma in English and that's why I usually use Slovak rules in my writing. There are only some cases when I noticed that it should be used and remembered it after seeing the expressions many times (Eg. "in fact," before "too" and similar).
I should really look into these things. And revise conditionals and phrasals.
 
  • #560
Sophia said:
Same here. Rule that there should never be a comma before "and" is one of the first grammar rules we learn (unless there's an exception, of course :-p).
I confess that I haven't studied use of comma in English and that's why I usually use Slovak rules in my writing. There are only some cases when I noticed that it should be used and remembered it after seeing the expressions many times (Eg. "in fact," before "too" and similar).
I should really look into these things. And revise conditionals and phrasals.
Only thing I know about them is, that there are far less commas in English. In case of doubt, I just don't make one or I make a point.
E.g:
Ibix said:
If I put in an Oxford comma I get: ...
would have to be "If I put in an Oxford comma, I (will) get: ..." in German.

The side effect, however, is that I unfortunately kind of randomize the usage of commas in English.
A US-American once told me that our sentences are far too long. That has been a good advice.
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
16
Replies
548
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
77
Replies
3K
Views
127K
Replies
21
Views
750
  • General Discussion
115
Replies
4K
Views
192K
  • General Discussion
65
Replies
2K
Views
142K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
422
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
883
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3K
Views
326K
Back
Top