- #526
Sophia
- 112
- 565
Thank you everyone for support :-) I feel better now :-)
Kind of like a Freudian slip.ProfuselyQuarky said:(I don't like violent notions, but had to laugh at it )
1oldman2 said:Kind of like a Freudian slip.
It curious how the way some people talk/behave give different people different impressions. Of course, it's cultural and depends on the way a person's been brought up, but even within the same school, the variety of language is extraordinary.Pepper Mint said:It's "weird" to me that strangers in your culture can tap or pat people's shoulders freely. In mine, those who do so to me at night should be gang i.e "Hey yo show me your wallet".
You should have asked him if she has told him not to touch her that way also.Sophia said:After I repeated, he got angry and told me he wasn't going to bite me and that he had a daughter older than me.
I have found that the people who get the most upset in these situations are usually the most guiltly. Pat yourself on the back for putting him in his place. You earned it.Sophia said:Than he left obviously annoyed and angry.
There are indeed big differences in personal space in various cultures. And then individual differences.Pepper Mint said:It's "weird" to me that strangers in your culture can tap or pat people's shoulders freely. In mine, those who do so to me at night should be gang i.e "Hey yo show me your wallet".
After all I've read (and seen) about obesity in the states, this sounds reasonable to me.WWGD said:I fell for it again. This place selling Indian food at 50% for lunch. I have a tasty, albeit smallish-sized meal.
I then look at other dinner's (eating at regular price) plates/servings, all of which are...twice as large as the ones in my plate, AKA,
pay only 50%...and get only 50% of the full portion..
Ah - the good old "buy one for the price of two and get one free!" trick.WWGD said:pay only 50%...and get only 50% of the full portion..
I have just one large meal a day, trying to save $ , and they are cheating people in the process.fresh_42 said:After all I've read (and seen) about obesity in the states, this sounds reasonable to me.
May have been a good thing to tell Dubya re the Merkel massage.1oldman2 said:Nope, not at all. The person doing the touching was obviously more comfortable with the hands on approach, but that's only half of the people involved. He shouldn't expect random strangers to appreciate that type of conduct.
Touche'WWGD said:May have been a good thing to tell Dubya re the Merkel massage.
You're right. It happens pretty often. If anyone's ever studied it, it would have been under the aegis of psychology. However, I haven't personally seen anyone offer a term or explanation for it, that I can recall.shadowshed said:Have you ever felt that we sometimes act in opposite way to the other person we're with?
For my example, I experience things like becoming braver around afraid people and step up to protect them, and get unreasonably childish when I'm around close friend who's more mature. Is there already scientific explanation behind this?
shadowshed said:Have you ever felt that we sometimes act in opposite way to the other person we're with?
For my example, I experience things like becoming braver around afraid people and step up to protect them, and get unreasonably childish when I'm around close friend who's more mature. Is there already scientific explanation behind this?
And then, this might be out of context, but I find myself being aware of my eating manner from time to time-- I also noticed that I'm more relaxed and unaware when there's someone next to me who eat more 'elegantly'. This is especially bothering me since I want to eat peacefully, but somehow I became aware of how I eat. Is this normal?
zoobyshoe said:You're right. It happens pretty often. If anyone's ever studied it, it would have been under the aegis of psychology. However, I haven't personally seen anyone offer a term or explanation for it, that I can recall.
collinsmark said:I can't say for sure if this is what you mean, but it might be related to humans' innate social dominance hierarchy -- the attempt of humans, like many other social animals, to form a "pecking order," so to speak.
If I remember correctly it has been Nobel himself who recognized that it helps him with his heart problems. But I'm not absolutely sure. What is certain is, that it has been at a time when people swallowed a lot of dubious substances as modern pharmacology was yet to start.zoobyshoe said:How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
Then what do you mean by a "bad" heart ?zoobyshoe said:How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
See the "History" section of the Wikipedia entry on nitroglycerin.zoobyshoe said:How did anyone ever discover that nitroglycerine is a good thing to ingest if you have a bad heart?
Thanks.Jonathan Scott said:See the "History" section of the Wikipedia entry on nitroglycerin.
zoobyshoe said:One linkleadled to another and I got to the original paper:
Pepper Mint said:This type of nitrate does have its good effect on widening our blood vessels. So the blood flow in them becomes smoother, uhm yeah. And I think it will probably have a bad effect on those with brain injuries instead though.
I'm sure she enjoys the time spent with her grand dad. And once she'll be thankful to you for teaching her to swim :-) same as it was something very special for me when my grandpa taught me to ride a bike.jim hardy said:Grand-daughter, nine, sure increased her prowess at swimming this last week in our lake.
Went from just a couple yards of dog paddle to fifty feet, still dog paddling with arms but good leg kicking,
she's almost ready to put face under water .
Have two days left to advance her to breast stroke, hyping it as "Frog Paddle"
and she tried out the kayak...
it's good for them to succeed.
zoobyshoe said:I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/what-is-the-oxford-comma-and-why-do-people-care-so-much-about-it/
I think I like Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty, and also find myself interested in other pop stars.Sophia said:That's interesting, never heard of Oxford comma before. In fact, I would assume that a comma before "and" is a mistake. I'll be wiser now!
Just to be clear, a comma before "and" is a mistake (or, at least, unnecessary) when you have only two things. It becomes necessary with three or more things (a list) to avoid the sort of confusion that comes from constructions like, "I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty."Sophia said:That's interesting, never heard of Oxford comma before. In fact, I would assume that a comma before "and" is a mistake. I'll be wiser now!
My difficulty arises from the fact, that it would be an error in my language. It would only be mandatory, if it was followed by a complete sentence and thus changes the subject.zoobyshoe said:Just to be clear, a comma before "and" is a mistake (or, at least, unnecessary) when you have only two things. It becomes necessary with three or more things (a list) to avoid the sort of confusion that comes from constructions like, "I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty."
I don't think it's so easy. Consider a modification of your list: "I love my mum, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty", which is unambiguous. If I put in an Oxford comma I get: "I love my mum, Lady Gaga, and Humpty Dumpty". That can be read as stating that my mum is Lady Gaga.zoobyshoe said:Just to be clear, a comma before "and" is a mistake (or, at least, unnecessary) when you have only two things. It becomes necessary with three or more things (a list) to avoid the sort of confusion that comes from constructions like, "I love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty."
Same here. Rule that there should never be a comma before "and" is one of the first grammar rules we learn (unless there's an exception, of course ).fresh_42 said:My difficulty arises from the fact, that it would be an error in my language. It would only be mandatory, if it was followed by a complete sentence.
The distinction between two and more listed objects sounds somehow not logic (to me).
Only thing I know about them is, that there are far less commas in English. In case of doubt, I just don't make one or I make a point.Sophia said:Same here. Rule that there should never be a comma before "and" is one of the first grammar rules we learn (unless there's an exception, of course ).
I confess that I haven't studied use of comma in English and that's why I usually use Slovak rules in my writing. There are only some cases when I noticed that it should be used and remembered it after seeing the expressions many times (Eg. "in fact," before "too" and similar).
I should really look into these things. And revise conditionals and phrasals.
would have to be "If I put in an Oxford comma, I (will) get: ..." in German.Ibix said:If I put in an Oxford comma I get: ...