Ratio of frequency between heavier and lighter part of composite cord

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the frequency of a composite cord connected to a vibrating source, confirming that sections A and B vibrate at the same frequency of 100 Hz. Participants clarify that while the frequencies are equal, the wave speeds and wavelengths differ due to the varying densities of the cord's sections. Some suggest the question may be misleading, implying it could be asking for the ratio of wavelengths instead. The importance of recognizing conceptual consistencies in physics is emphasized, highlighting a common misconception in relativity. Understanding these fundamental principles is crucial for mastering the subject.
songoku
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
391
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
v = λ.f
1714016152742.png


Is the answer 1? Because the cord is connected to vibrating source and it vibrates with a frequency of 100 Hz so section A and B have the same frequency

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
Homework Statement: Please see below
Relevant Equations: v = λ.f

View attachment 344025

Is the answer 1? Because the cord is connected to vibrating source and it vibrates with a frequency of 100 Hz so section A and B have the same frequency

Thanks
Either it is a trick question or they meant to ask for the ratio of wavelengths.
 
Yes, the frequencies must be the same. The speed of the waves and the wavelengths will differ.
 
Thank you very much haruspex and Orodruin
 
haruspex said:
Either it is a trick question or they meant to ask for the ratio of wavelengths.
I would not call it a trick question. Realising that something conceptual does not change or when something is trivial is a very important skill in understanding a subject. For example, I keep asking relativity students a question where a muon travels a certain distance in the lab frame before decaying and I want them to tell me how far it travels in its rest frame. I keep asking because I have seen people get it wrong so many times and it illustrates something fundamental.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top