Ratio of functions, surjective (analysis course)

riskandar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let f: R->R be a continuous function
Suppose k>=1 is an integer such that

lim f(x)/x^k = lim f(x)/x^k = 0
x->inf x->-inf

set g(x)= x^k + f(x)

g: R->R

Prove that
(i) if k is odd, then g is surjective
(ii) if k is even, then there is a real number y such that the image of g is [y,inf)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am completely stuck at this all I can think of is x^k goes to infinity then the ratio of the functions can go to 0 if either f(x) goes to 0 or f(x) is a constant or f(x) goes to infinity slower than x^k (I am not sure about this)

Any help will be very much appreciateve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because g is continuous, you can use the intermediate value theorem. To show that g is surjective, it is enough to show that g becomes both very large and very large negative.

To prove this part, you need to think about the qualitative behavior of f and g. The hypothesis on f says that f(x) is negligible compared to x^k as |x| becomes large. Therefore g(x) should "behave almost like" x^k as |x| becomes large. Figure out a way to make this precise.
 
ystael said:
Because g is continuous, you can use the intermediate value theorem. To show that g is surjective, it is enough to show that g becomes both very large and very large negative.

To prove this part, you need to think about the qualitative behavior of f and g. The hypothesis on f says that f(x) is negligible compared to x^k as |x| becomes large. Therefore g(x) should "behave almost like" x^k as |x| becomes large. Figure out a way to make this precise.

Thank you for the reply.
Where do I use the intermediate value theorem? Is it to prove surjective?
 
riskandar said:
Thank you for the reply.
Where do I use the intermediate value theorem? Is it to prove surjective?

Yes.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top