Ratio of K. E. of solid cylinder to shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of kinetic energy for a solid cylinder compared to a hollow cylinder. The total kinetic energy for the solid cylinder is derived as 3/4 mv², while for the hollow cylinder, it is simply mv². The conclusion drawn is that the ratio of kinetic energies indicates that the solid cylinder has less kinetic energy than the hollow cylinder when both are moving at the same velocity. The correctness of the calculations and conclusions is affirmed by participants. The final consensus confirms that the solid cylinder's kinetic energy is indeed less than that of the hollow cylinder.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-22_11-38-41.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


total kinetic energy of a rigid body = rotational kinetic energy of the body around its center of mass + translational kinetic energy of center of mass

For solid cylinder, total kinetic energy = ## \frac { [I = \frac 1 2 mR^2]\omega ^2 } 2 + \frac 1 2 mv^2 = \frac { 3 mv^2} 4;~ v = \omega R ##

Similarly for hollow cylinder , total kinetic energy = ## mv^2 ##

So, the correct opinion is (a).

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-22_11-38-41.png
    upload_2017-12-22_11-38-41.png
    15.6 KB · Views: 795
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
the correct opinion is (a).
yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top