Rayleigh Refractometer index of refraction

n0_3sc
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
When constructing a Rayleigh Refractometer the formula for the refractive index of a gas at pressure P and temperature T is:

mu(P,T) - 1 = (gamma) P/T
where,
mu(P,T) = refractive index as a function of pressure and temperature
and
gamma = [n(lambda)Ta]/[L(deltaP)]
where,
n = fringe number
lambda = wavelength
Ta = Ambient room Temperature
L = length of tube containing the gas
and
deltaP = change in pressure causing the movement in fringes.

My question is how do you prove gamma? - I cannot find this in any physics/optics book.

Any suggestions on where to start or look will be good.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is gamma? The frequency?

If I'm understanding the rest correctly, you have two tubes filled with gasses of different refractive index. One is known and the other is not.

If n_1 &=& 1 then the number of wavelengths needed to traverse the tube is m_1 &=& \frac{L n_1}{\lambda_{vacuum}}. Likewise the number of wavelengths need to traverse the second tube is m_2 &=& \frac{L n_2}{\lambda_{vacuum}}.
 
yeah I already knew those formula's you listed.
Gamma is a proportionality constant. I think the lecturer just manipulated one of the "Jamin Inteferometer" formulas into this form and used gamma to represent part of the over all equation.
 
Well it looks like gamma is a function of the T and p and
\frac{T}{p} = \frac{V}{moles\cdot R}
Since your volume is fixed I imagine that gamma must be a function of number of moles and the Rydberg constant. The Rydberg constant is given by
R_\infty = \frac{m_e e^4}{(4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2 \hbar^3 4 \pi c} = 1.0973731568525(73) \cdot 10^7 \,\mathrm{m}^{-1}
I'm not sure if the Rydberg constant is fixed or not, although it is referred to as a constant.

I'm not sure how the following relates but the refractive index can also be represented as
n=\sqrt{\epsilon_r\mu_r}

Do you have a fixed number of moles?
 
Last edited:
Wait. I think I made a mistake. R is NOT the Rydberg constant. It is the ideal gas constant.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top