RCC circuit, posible mistake with constants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem involving two capacitors (C1 and C2) and a resistor (R1) with initial voltages. The user initially struggles with determining the correct constant values in their differential equation solution and questions the validity of their findings, particularly regarding the relationship between v1(inf) and v2(inf). A mistake in applying Kirchhoff's voltage law is identified, leading to a revised solution that includes a time constant of 1s. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the potential drops across capacitors and suggests modeling pre-charged capacitors as uncharged ones in series with a voltage supply. The overall focus is on clarifying the circuit behavior and ensuring accurate calculations.
1f5
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



There's a circuit, with a capacitor C1, Resistor R1, and another capacitor C2.
In t=0 ; C1 is charged with 2 V and C2 with 1 V
The value of resistor is 1 ohm, C1= 1 F C2=0.5 F



Homework Equations



Kirchoff voltage law.
Capacitor voltage at any given time. (integral form)


The Attempt at a Solution



I solve the resulting diferential equation, but don't know constant value. I believed that it was -3

One of the things that the problem request if to find a expresion for v1(t), v2(t). I substituted i(t) (diferential equation solution) in the integral form of capacitor voltage formula, well that was easy, but another incise in the problem is to prove that v1(inf)=v2(inf), with the constants from the last integration it is impossible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1f5 said:

Homework Statement



There's a circuit, with a capacitor C1, Resistor R1, and another capacitor C2.
In t=0 ; C1 is charged with 2 V and C2 with 1 V
The value of resistor is 1 ohm, C1= 1 F C2=0.5 F

Homework Equations



Kirchoff voltage law.
Capacitor voltage at any given time. (integral form)

The Attempt at a Solution



I solve the resulting diferential equation, but don't know constant value. I believed that it was -3

One of the things that the problem request if to find a expresion for v1(t), v2(t). I substituted i(t) (diferential equation solution) in the integral form of capacitor voltage formula, well that was easy, but another incise in the problem is to prove that v1(inf)=v2(inf), with the constants from the last integration it is impossible.

Is there a circuit diagram to go with this problem? There are several ways to connect three components, and various polarities for the charges on the capacitors.
 
Last edited:
RCC picture

circ2.jpg

upload picture

Later i discovered that I have a mistake with voltage law, then i resolve the DE and had Ce^(-t/r)
After that i make a sim, and see that the current in t=0 is -1A and tends to zero when t goes to infinity. So the function must be -e^(-t).
(r1=equals 1).

I saw voltages too, but i can't figure from which function they come.
 
Last edited:
The initial current is unlikely to be negative if initially v1 > v2. Also, how do you arrive at a time constant of 1s? By inspection we can see that the current loop has C1 and C2 in series with a resistance R. What's the effective capacitance for C1 and C2 in series? The time constant should then resolve to RCeff when you solve your differential equation.

Perhaps you should show more of your steps used to solve the DE.
 
Yes, you were right.

circuit3.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes fenixmistico
1f5 said:
Yes, you were right.

circuit3.jpg

Don't let the initial potentials on the capacitors fool you into making wrong choices regarding potential drops due to current flow through them. Whichever plate of a capacitor the current flows INTO with be the + plate as far as the potential drop for the differential equation is concerned.

attachment.php?attachmentid=51355&stc=1&d=1349032731.gif


If you want to make it more obvious, note that you can model a pre-charged capacitor as an uncharged capacitor in series with a voltage supply:

attachment.php?attachmentid=51356&stc=1&d=1349033152.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    13.1 KB · Views: 972
  • Fig2.gif
    Fig2.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 970
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top