Reciprocity theorem and ideal gas law

AI Thread Summary
The reciprocity theorem is a principle in physics that relates to the behavior of systems under certain conditions. The ideal gas law, expressed as PV=nRT, is derived from Charles' law, Boyle's law, and Avogadro's law, and does not adhere to the reciprocity theorem. The discussion emphasizes that the ideal gas law is independent of the reciprocity theorem. Therefore, the two concepts are not directly related. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the principles of thermodynamics and gas behavior.
cooper607
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
what is the reciprocity theorem? and does ideal gas law PV=nRT follows the theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cooper607 said:
what is the reciprocity theorem? and does ideal gas law PV=nRT follows the theorem?

This question is way too wide.

Here is Reciprocity theorem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocity_theorem

And no, ideal gas law PV=nRT is derived by combing Charles' law , Boyle's law and Avogadro's law and has nothing to do with reciprocity !
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Back
Top