Recurrence relation for harmonic oscillator wave functions

squareroot
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
I've been using a recurrence relation from "Adv. in Physics"1966 Nr.57 Vol 15 . The relation is :
Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.40 AM.png

where Rnl are radial harmonic oscillator wave functions of form:

Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.49 AM.png


The problem is that I can't prove the relation above with the form of Rnl given by the author(above). I've been trying to check this using Mathematica. The form in which I need to use this is the following:
Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.28 AM.png

Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.46 AM.png


Here, I use the Rnl's as radial wave-functions for neutrons and protons and multiply the first relation with Rprotonnl and integrate over spherical coordinates.(P.S the R's where noted by g's ).

My questions is why would a relation like this only hold if the R's(or g, respectively) are normalized? Should't this relation hold for any radial wavefunctions? Where does the normalization condition comes from?

The above relations are equivalent with let's say

$$ | \alpha \rangle = a |\beta \rangle + b|\gamma \rangle $$

and by multiplying with the bra ## | \alpha \rangle ## to the left one gets

$$ \langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle = a \langle \alpha | \beta \rangle + b \langle \alpha | \gamma \rangle $$

This is kind of my case above, but from my reasoning it should hold with no dependence on the normalization of the functions.

Thank you!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.40 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.40 AM.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 969
  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.49 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.35.49 AM.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 715
  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.28 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.28 AM.png
    7.7 KB · Views: 680
  • Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.46 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-11-18 at 11.43.46 AM.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 658
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The associated Laguerre polynomials are not orthogonal for different values of ##l##. It is the angular part that ensures the orthogonality of the wave functions for different ##l##s.
 
I know that. My question was related to the fact that I can check the recurrence relation ONLY if I normalize the Rnl's first. If I try to use the relation with non-normalized wave-functions the relation doesn't hold and I can't understand why the relation doesn't hold. That recurrence relation, from my reasoning, should hold even for non-normalized functions.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top