Reference points in a moving system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the momentum equations for two colliding particles within a moving box. The first equation accurately represents the total momentum before the collision, while the second equation indicates that the combined mass travels at the same velocity after coalescing. This is due to the nature of the collision, where the particles stick together, necessitating a common velocity post-collision. The confusion stems from interpreting the language used in the problem, which emphasizes that this outcome is a requirement rather than an assumption. Understanding that the particles must travel together after coalescing clarifies the momentum conservation principle in this scenario.
klkc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been looking at one of my review sheets, and do not know how the professor got the equations.

Here is the relevant paragraph:

Consider two particles of mass m1 and m2 isolated within a box, with respect to which
they have velocities u1 and u2. The box is moving at a steady v0 relative to some external
frame of reference. At some instant, the particles collide and coalesce. The momentum just
before and just after this event must be respectively

Homework Equations



Pbefore = mass1(u1+v0) + mass2(u2+v0)

Pafter = (mass1+mass2)(v1+v0)

The Attempt at a Solution



The first equation I understand, but doesn't the second equation imply that both masses are traveling the same speed? Why would two different masses collide and then travel the same velocity?

I'm confused because the paragraph says it MUST BE this, implying I'm not getting something, rather than ASSUME, which would be setting conditions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem description describes that the two particles "collide and coalesce". The later means that the two particles stick together after the collision and, hence, they travel with same velocity. Given a priori that the two particle stick together, the momumentum written as Pafter is a "must be" thing (assuming here that v1 is the velocity of the two particles relative to the box after collision).
 
Thanks for the reply!
 
Back
Top