Regarding the Electric Potential Formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Electric Potential formula is defined as "electric potential = k * (Q/r)", where Q is the source charge and r is the distance from Q. The discussion clarifies that this formula only accounts for the source charge and is independent of any secondary charge present at distance r. This independence is analogous to gravitational potential, which is defined as energy per mass and does not depend on the mass of the object. The concept is crucial for solving problems related to changes in electrical potential energy, as the change remains consistent regardless of the specific values of the charges involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Electric Potential and its formula
  • Familiarity with the concept of point charges in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential and gravitational potential energy
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the superposition principle in electric fields
  • Study the relationship between electric potential and electric field strength
  • Investigate the concept of electric potential energy in multi-charge systems
  • Learn about the applications of electric potential in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electric potential and its applications in problem-solving.

needingtoknow
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The formula for Electric Potential as I have it is: "Let Q be a point source charge. At any point P that's a distance r from Q, we say that the electric potential at P is the scalar given by this formula:

electric potential = k * (Q/r)

My question is what if at some distance r from Q, the charge is very large. Wouldn't that then affect the electric potential. In other words how can this electric potential formula not take into account both charges and only takes into account Q which is the source charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just because elecitric potential is "energy per charge" and so is independent of the size of the charge (although the energy and force will vary at that same distance depending on the charge)

It's very much like "gravitational potential" (not to be confused with "gravitational potential energy") which is independent of the mass of the object simply because it's defined as "energy per mass"
 
So if it is independent of the size of the charge then how it is useful in solving problems to determine the change in electrical potential energy?
 
Actually I am recalling from gravitation potential energy that you will get different values for PE depending on where you set PEgrav = 0 at. But if you try to find the change in gravitational potential energy that will be the same no matter where you set PEgrav = 0 at. Does the same idea apply here in the sense that if you find the change in gravitational potential energy it doesn't matter what you set as Q, the source charge or what q, the secondary charge is?
 
needingtoknow said:
So if it is independent of the size of the charge then how it is useful in solving problems to determine the change in electrical potential energy?

I'm probably not the best person to give a good example. But to me this seems like asking, "why is it useful to say 'g=9.8' for solving problems if that doesn't give the force on an object?"

It's more for when you are interested in a certain position, irrespective of the charge (or mass) in it.
(I'm sorry :smile: I'm sure there are much better explanations)

needingtoknow said:
But if you try to find the change in gravitational potential energy that will be the same no matter where you set PEgrav = 0 at.

This is only because when you find the "change" in gravitational potential energy, a final and initial position are implied. So you could pick any random PE=0 position, but it will always reduce to the "final position" becoming the PE=0 position
(simply because the PE that they have in common (relative to your PE=0 position) is irrelevant, and "cancels out")
 
The point charge is supposed to be a "test charge" that is very small compared to Q.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
681
Replies
4
Views
925
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
749
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K