A Relation between Vector Norms in Cylindrical and Cartesian Coordinates

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Relations between vectors in cylindrical and
Cartesian
coordinate systems are given by
\vec{e}_{\rho}=\cos \varphi \vec{e}_x+\sin \varphi \vec{e}_y
\vec{e}_{\varphi}=-\sin \varphi \vec{e}_x+\cos \varphi \vec{e}_y
\vec{e}_z=\vec{e}_z
We can write this in form
<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \vec{e}_{\rho} \\[0.3em]<br /> \vec{e}_{\varphi} \\[0.3em]<br /> \vec{e}_z \\[0.3em]<br /> <br /> <br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \cos \varphi &amp; \sin \varphi &amp; 0 \\[0.3em]<br /> -\sin \varphi &amp; \cos \varphi &amp; 0 \\[0.3em]<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\[0.3em]<br /> <br /> <br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \vec{e}_x \\[0.3em]<br /> \vec{e}_y \\[0.3em]<br /> \vec{e}_z \\[0.3em]<br /> <br /> <br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
where matrix ##
\begin{bmatrix}
\cos \varphi & \sin \varphi & 0 \\[0.3em]
-\sin \varphi & \cos \varphi & 0 \\[0.3em]
0 & 0 & 1 \\[0.3em]


\end{bmatrix}## is orthogonal. Then means that norms of the vectors ##
\begin{bmatrix}
\vec{e}_x \\[0.3em]
\vec{e}_y \\[0.3em]
\vec{e}_z \\[0.3em]


\end{bmatrix}## and
##
\begin{bmatrix}
\vec{e}_{\rho} \\[0.3em]
\vec{e}_{\varphi} \\[0.3em]
\vec{e}_z \\[0.3em]


\end{bmatrix}## are the same. But how to define norm of vector
##\begin{bmatrix}
\vec{e}_{\rho} \\[0.3em]
\vec{e}_{\varphi} \\[0.3em]
\vec{e}_z \\[0.3em]


\end{bmatrix}##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
Relations between vectors in cylindrical and
Cartesian
coordinate systems are given by ...
What is it you are saying here ? Because what you describe is the cartesian coordinates after a rotation over an angle ##\phi## around the z-axis. A vector ##(a,b,c)## in cartesian coordiates is not identical to a vector ##(\rho, \phi, z)## in cylindrical coordinates with ##\rho = a\cos\phi+b\sin\phi\,,\ \ ## etc
 
LagrangeEuler said:
But how to define norm of vector
Generally: norm squared of ##\,\vec v\ \ ## is ##\ \ \vec v\cdot\vec v## .
Since the angle between a vector and itself is zero, this is pretty easy:
In cylindrical coordinates ##\sqrt{\rho^2+z^2\ }\ ## and for spherical coordinates simply ##r##.

For the inner product in general you need the angle between the two vectors. Probably easiest to first convert to cartesian coordinates and work it out for the various coordinate systems.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top