Relationship between Cp, Cv and R

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between heat capacities Cp and Cv is defined by Meyer's relation, which states that Cp - Cv = nR, where n represents the number of moles of gas. The distinction between specific heat capacities (cp = Cp/M) and molar heat capacities (cp = Cp/n) is crucial for accurate calculations. The formula can also be expressed as cp - cv = R/μ, where μ is the molar mass of the gas. Clarity in notation and context is essential for determining which definition applies in various problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics concepts, specifically heat capacities.
  • Familiarity with Meyer's relation and its applications.
  • Knowledge of molecular mass and its role in heat capacity calculations.
  • Ability to differentiate between specific and molar heat capacities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Meyer's relation in thermodynamics.
  • Learn about the differences between specific heat capacities and molar heat capacities.
  • Explore examples of heat capacity calculations in ideal gases.
  • Investigate the implications of using different notations in thermodynamic equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, chemical engineering, and physical chemistry who are looking to deepen their understanding of heat capacity relationships and their applications in gas laws.

PSN03
Messages
100
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Cp and Cv are specific heats at constant pressure and constant volume respectively. It is observed that
Cp−Cv =a for hydrogen gas
C p−Cv=b for nitrogen gas
The correct relation between a and b is :
Relevant Equations
Cp-Cv=R where R is gas constant
According to me a=b cause what I have been learning is R is gas constant and hence it will be same for both. But the solution have says something else.
According to them Cp-Cv=R/M where M is the molecular mass of gas.
So is the above mentioned formula correct? Do we have to take that M term always and in all the problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meyer's relation can be written like$$C_p - C_v = nR$$where ##n## is the number of moles of the gas. Often you might want to consider the specific heat capacities, ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{M}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{M}##, in which case$$c_p -c_v = \frac{nR}{M} = \frac{R}{\mu}$$where ##\mu = \frac{M}{n}## is the molar mass of the gas

(To make matters more confusing, sometimes people use the lower-case notation for molar heat capacities instead, i.e. defining ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{n}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{n}##, in which case Meyer's relation reads ##c_p - c_v = R##)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PSN03
etotheipi said:
If that is the original problem statement, then it's a really poorly worded question. Meyer's relation can be written like$$C_p - C_v = nR$$where ##n## is the number of moles of the gas. Often you might want to consider the specific heat capacities, ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{M}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{M}##, in which case$$c_p -c_v = \frac{nR}{M} = \frac{R}{\mu}$$where ##\mu = \frac{M}{n}## is the molecular mass of the gas. To make matters more confusing, sometimes people use the lower-case notation for molar heat capacities, i.e. defining ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{n}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{n}##, in which case Meyer's relation reads$$c_p - c_v = R$$Really the question is unanswerable unless you know whether the heat capacities are specific or molar. Furthermore, are we to assume that the mass, or alternatively the number of moles, is fixed?
Thanks a lot for your help. By the way only that much information is provided.
can I conclude that Cp/n is molar heat capacity and Cp/M is specific heat capacity and Cp is just heat capacity, right?
 
Yes, by specific it means per unit mass, and the correct relation in this case will be ##c_p - c_v = \frac{R}{\mu}##. More generally, it should be fairly clear from context which definition is being used, but it's something to be careful about!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PSN03
etotheipi said:
Yes, by specific it means per unit mass, and the correct relation in this case will be ##c_p - c_v = \frac{R}{\mu}##. More generally, it should be fairly clear from context which definition is being used, but it's something to be careful about!
Thanks a lot for your help. I was beating my head about this problem for long but finally it's done. Good day and stay safe 😊
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
etotheipi said:
Meyer's relation can be written like$$C_p - C_v = nR$$where ##n## is the number of moles of the gas. Often you might want to consider the specific heat capacities, ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{M}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{M}##, in which case$$c_p -c_v = \frac{nR}{M} = \frac{R}{\mu}$$where ##\mu = \frac{M}{n}## is the molar mass of the gas

(To make matters more confusing, sometimes people use the lower-case notation for molar heat capacities instead, i.e. defining ##c_p = \frac{C_p}{n}## and ##c_v = \frac{C_v}{n}##, in which case Meyer's relation reads ##c_p - c_v = R##)
I don’t think so, if Cp and Cv are the molar heat capacities, then Cp -Cv= R (without the n).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Chestermiller said:
I don’t think so, if Cp and Cv are the molar heat capacities, then Cp -Cv= R (without the n).

I used ##C_v## and ##C_p## for the extensive heat capacity, and ##c_p## and ##c_v## for the specific heat capacity. Then in the note at the end I mentioned that if ##c_p## and ##c_v## are instead molar heat capacities, the relation is ##c_p - c_v = R## like you say. I don't know what notation is most widely used, though!
 
etotheipi said:
I used ##C_v## and ##C_p## for the extensive heat capacity, and ##c_p## and ##c_v## for the specific heat capacity. Then in the note at the end I mentioned that if ##c_p## and ##c_v## are instead molar heat capacities, the relation is ##c_p - c_v = R## like you say. I don't know what notation is most widely used, though!
It seemed to me that the OP in post #1 was asking about the molar heat capacities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
938
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K