Relativistic momentum and gamma factor - differential equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the force equations for a relativistic particle under different conditions, specifically when the force is perpendicular and parallel to the particle's velocity. There is confusion regarding the time derivative of the gamma factor, particularly why it is zero in the perpendicular case and the use of v_x instead of v. Participants suggest revisiting the time derivative of the full momentum vector to clarify the relationship. Additionally, there is a challenge in integrating the kinetic energy equation, with hints provided to explore hyperbolic functions for a solution. The conversation emphasizes breaking down complex problems into manageable parts for better understanding.
kapitan90
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am supposed to show that the force on a relativistic particle when
a) it's perpendicular to particle's velocity is F=γm_0\frac{dv}{dt}
b) it's parallel to particle's velocity is F_x=m_0γ^3\frac{dv_x}{dt}

I may make use of the fact that \frac{dγ}{dt}=\frac{v_xγ^3}{c^2}*\frac{dv_x}{dt}
2. Relevant equation
I don't understand why \frac{dγ}{dt}is 0 in case a) (this follows from the last formula, but I don't understand it either), why do we use v_x instead of v which γ depends on ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am also supposed to show that the kinetic energy of a particle accelerated from rest to v_xisW =∫F_xdx=m_0c^2(γ-1) but I am stuck with the integral∫ (1-v^2/c^2)^{-0.5} dx I tried to integrate it by parts and to use Wolfram, but it couldn't solve it either. Any ideas?
 
One problem at a time. First problem
Your formula for d(gamma)/dt is not quite right. Well, it's right for your scenario, but it's also confusing you. Try going over the time derivative again. Maybe first try to take the time derivative of the full momentum vector, and then analyze the two cases when it comes time. Then to predict a future complication, don't be worried if you have a v^2/c^2, you can rewrite as some common terms.

Okay, because I don't know when I'll check back, I'll give you a clue to the second problem, it starts with hyper and ends with trig.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top