Relativity -- Momentum and energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the Lorentz factor (γ) for protons in high-energy physics scenarios. For part (a), the value of γ for a Tevatron proton is derived from the ratio of its energy (1000 GeV) to its rest energy (938 MeV), leading to γ = 10^3/938. In part (b), the energy of an electron in the rest frame of Fermilab's buffalo herd is calculated using kinetic and binding energy equations, with the suggestion to apply γ directly to simplify calculations. Participants clarify that using the relationship γ = E/E0 eliminates the need for intermediate steps, correcting earlier errors in the calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accuracy in energy and momentum calculations in relativistic contexts.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


(a) A proton at rest has energy Eproton = mprotonc2 ≈ 938 MeV. (Its momentum is zero). The protons which circulated inside the Fermilab Bevatron had energies close to 1000 GeV (1GeV = 1000 MeV). What value of γ did a Tevatron proton have?

(b) Somehow a Bevatron proton captures an electron, becoming a fast-moving hydrogen atom without changing its speed. An electron at rest has Eelectron = mec2 ≈ 0.511 MeV. What is the electron's energy in the rest frame of Fermilab's sedentary buffalo herd?

Homework Equations


##\gamma = \dfrac{1}{1-\beta^2}##
where ##β = \frac{v}{c} ##
KE = TE - BE (TE is total energy, BE is rest energy or binding energy)

The Attempt at a Solution


I just want to check if my solution is correct or not.
(a) p (momentum) = ##\sqrt{2mK}##
K = 106 MeV - 938 MeV
So, mv = ##\sqrt{2mK}##
v = ##\sqrt{\frac{2K}{m}}##
Substitute for K = 1.6 × 10-13 J and m = 1.67 × 10-27 kg and get v in m/s
Substitute v in the equation for ##\gamma##

(b) Energy = KE + BE
= ##\frac{m_e v^2}{2}## + 0.511 × 106 × 1.6 × 10-19
Substitute in v from above equation, and sub in mass of electron.

Are these calculations right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about using ##E = \gamma mc^2##
 
For what part? The second?
 
erisedk said:
For what part? The second?
Why not both?
 
So you mean,
(a) ##\gamma = \dfrac{10^3}{938} ##

and
(b) ## E = \dfrac{10^3}{938} × 0.511 MeV ##

Why? Also, is my answer wrong?
 
erisedk said:
So you mean,
(a) ##\gamma = \dfrac{10^3}{938} ##

and
(b) ## E = \dfrac{10^3}{938} × 0.511 MeV ##

Why? Also, is my answer wrong?

Those should be ##10^6##, otherwise yes.

Note that, for a particle:

##\gamma = E/E_0##

So if you have the energies, there is no need for all those intermediate calculations, which I didn't check.
 
Oh, okay I get it!
And yeah, that was a careless error, it is 106
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top