Relativity Questions: Answers Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheScienceOrca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
TheScienceOrca
Messages
106
Reaction score
6
After learning more about relativity, and the vast amount of knowledge that is on this forum, I would like to clear up a few questions I had about relativity.

1) If Alice is on a planet and sees Bob fly away from her through the universe at .9c relative to her and bob then throws a baseball at .9c in the same direction he is traveling in I have a few questions;


If you let each object move for 1 second relative to the object itself would you see from a fourth frame of reference; Alice, Bob, and Bob's baseball should be moving for different amounts of time relative to you as they are traveling at different speeds.

If you measured the distance from Alice and Bob would it be .9ls?

If you measured the distance from Bob and Bobs Baseball Would it be .9ls?

If you measured the distance between Alice and Bobs Baseball would it be 1.8ls?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheScienceOrca said:
1) If Alice is on a planet and sees Bob fly away from her through the universe at .9c relative to her and bob then throws a baseball at .9c in the same direction he is traveling in

Is the baseball moving at 0.9c relative to Bob? I assume so, but you should make these things explicit. General rule: any time you specify a distance, time, or speed, you need to specify what it's relative to. For distances, you also need to specify at what time the distance is measured; and for times, you need to specify between which two events the time is measured.

TheScienceOrca said:
If you let each object move for 1 second relative to the object itself would you see from a fourth frame of reference; Alice, Bob, and Bob's baseball should be moving for different amounts of time relative to you as they are traveling at different speeds.

Yes, 1 second for each of these objects, according to the object's own clock, will correspond to a different amount of time according to you since all three of them are moving relative to you, and at different speeds.

TheScienceOrca said:
If you measured the distance from Alice and Bob would it be .9ls?

If you measured the distance from Bob and Bobs Baseball Would it be .9ls?

If you measured the distance between Alice and Bobs Baseball would it be 1.8ls?

All of these questions are not well-defined, because you haven't said what you're measuring the distance relative to, nor have you specified at what time the distances are being measured.
 
TheScienceOrca said:
If you let each object move for 1 second relative to the object itself would you see from a fourth frame of reference; Alice, Bob, and Bob's baseball should be moving for different amounts of time relative to you as they are traveling at different speeds.

What is the fourth frame of reference? How fast are Alice, Bob and Mr. Baseball traveling with respect to it?

If you measured the distance from Alice and Bob would it be .9ls?
It could be, if the fourth frame happens to be the one in which Alice is at rest or the one in which Bob is at rest. Try calculating it from some other frame.

If you measured the distance from Bob and Bobs Baseball Would it be .9ls?
It could be, if the fourth frame happens to be the one in which Bob is at rest or the one in which Bob's baseball is at rest. Try calculating it from some other frame.

If you measured the distance between Alice and Bobs Baseball would it be 1.8ls?

It could be, if the fourth frame happens to be the one in which Bob is at rest. Try calculating it from some other frame.
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
Replies
57
Views
4K
Replies
123
Views
9K
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
4K
Back
Top