Replacing column by equivalent force and couple

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of replacing a column with an equivalent force and couple at point C in a beam analysis using the Hardy Cross method. The user has successfully completed the stiffness and distribution factors but struggles with the concept of equilibrium required for part b of the question. The solution involves replacing the horizontal force at point D with an equivalent force and moment at point C, ensuring that the direction and magnitude of forces are maintained. A suggested approach is to visualize adding equal and opposite forces at C to maintain equilibrium. Understanding this concept is crucial for progressing with the analysis.
wee VooDoo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The Problem
I've been given the beam shown below to carry out the Hardy Cross method (Moment Distribution) too. I have no problems with the method but I'm struggling with part b, which states "Replace column by an equivalent force and couple at point C"
http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/1705/problemat.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Excuse the crude photoshopping! The column is 1unit in length and infinitely stiff.

Part a of the question was work out stiffness and distribution factors which were easy.
But part b states "Replace column by an equivalent force and couple at point C" and I can't do the rest of the question without this. I've tried and failed many times.

I've tried replacing with what I think is right, and replacing by guessing but I don't think I understand what to do. I tried inserting a column straight underneath with the same length and the 10kN load acting to the left. But that would double the moment around C so I'm stumped.

Any help pointing me in the right direction is very appreciated. Feel stupid that I can do the hard bits but can't figure out the couple! lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What the problem is asking you to do is replace the horizontal force at D with an equivalent force and moment at C such that equilibrium is maintained. In other words, the force at C will have the same direction and magnitude as the force at D. The moment acting at C due to the force at D should be easy to determine (not guess).
 
Thanks SteamKing. I know it sounded stupid but I just could not figure it out for the life of me. Too much studying frying my head! Thanks again!
 
another to look at it is: Add a 10 kN to the right at C, and another 10 kN force at C to the left. In other words nothing has changed. Now you can regard the rightwards force at D and the leftwards force at C as a moment (at C if you like, it doesn't matter where). The remainder is the rightwards force at C.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top