Resistance - fluid resistance to ball motion

basketball5rya
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Resistance -- fluid resistance to ball motion

A ball of mass m = 3 kg is falling from an initial height y = 3 m in an area where the acceleration due to gravity can be approximated as g = 10 m/s2. As it falls the ball is subjected to a fluid resistance of magnitude FR = kv where k = 6 kg/s. How many seconds will it take for the acceleration of the ball to decrease to a value a = 9 m/s2? Type the numerical value only, not the unit. Round off your answer to 3 decimal place.


The Attempt at a Solution


I did FR=kv
FR=mg
3(10)=30
30=6v
v=5m/s

I don't know if this step is right...
v=v0+at
v=at
5=9t
5/9=t

PART B: I have no clue on this one.

Consider the problem of an object falling from rest in a fluid where the resistance is FR = kv. How many time constants will it take for the object to reach a velocity that represents 72% of its terminal velocity? The time constant is the ratio m/k where m is the mass of the falling object and k is the coefficient of the resistance force. Round off your answer to 1 decimal place.

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
basketball5rya said:
A ball of mass m = 3 kg is falling from an initial height y = 3 m in an area where the acceleration due to gravity can be approximated as g = 10 m/s2. As it falls the ball is subjected to a fluid resistance of magnitude FR = kv where k = 6 kg/s. How many seconds will it take for the acceleration of the ball to decrease to a value a = 9 m/s2? Type the numerical value only, not the unit. Round off your answer to 3 decimal place.


The Attempt at a Solution


I did FR=kv
FR=mg
3(10)=30
30=6v
v=5m/s

I don't know if this step is right...
v=v0+at
v=at
5=9t
5/9=t

PART B: I have no clue on this one.

Consider the problem of an object falling from rest in a fluid where the resistance is FR = kv. How many time constants will it take for the object to reach a velocity that represents 72% of its terminal velocity? The time constant is the ratio m/k where m is the mass of the falling object and k is the coefficient of the resistance force. Round off your answer to 1 decimal place.

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks

No, that's not going well. In the first attempt you solved for the terminal velocity, which is not what you want. What you did from there is also wrong those equations only apply to motion at uniform acceleration. The way to do it is considerably more complicated. You need to get a differential equation for dv/dt and solve it. Have seen or done anything like that?
 
I have in calculus but not in physics before. Was your first reply correct? The F=mg-FR=mg-kv? If so, I got v=1/2 m/s.
F=mg-kv
ma=mg-kv
3(9)=3(10)-6v
-3=-6v
1/2=v

I guess I need a full on explanation on what's going on in this problem :/ sorry
 
basketball5rya said:
I have in calculus but not in physics before. Was your first reply correct? The F=mg-FR=mg-kv? If so, I got v=1/2 m/s.
F=mg-kv
ma=mg-kv
3(9)=3(10)-6v
-3=-6v
1/2=v

I guess I need a full on explanation on what's going on in this problem :/ sorry

If you've done it in calculus, you should be able to pull it off in physics. F=ma means F=m*dv/dt, right? Since a=dv/dt. And yes, F=mg-kv. It's the difference between the gravitational force and the resistive force. So m*dv/dt=mg-kv. Try and solve that differential equation for v as a function of time v(t). You can't just put a=9. a depends on time, a(t)=10 at t=0 and a(t)=9 only at the time you are looking for. Remember differential equations?
 
Alright I went ahead and tried to differentiate equation.

m*dv/dt=mg-kv
dv/dt=g-(kv/m)
dv=(g-(kv/m))*dt
dt=(1/(g-(kv/m))*dv
Let:
u=g-(kv/m)
du=(-k/m)dv
dv=(-m/k)du
(-m/k)du/u=dt
(1/u)du=dt(-k/m)
ln(u)=(-k/m)t+C
e^ln(u)=e^[(-kt/m)(kC/m)]
g-(kv/m)=e^[(-kt/m)(kC/m)]
v=(m*e^[(-kt/m)(kC/m)]-g)/-k

Is this right? I'm not very confident it is but I gave it my best shot.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top