Resolving Forces and Sizing Profiles in Structural Engineering

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving forces and sizing profiles for a structural frame supporting a 32,000 kN pipe. The user is facing inconsistencies in force calculations across different members, particularly between members M20 and M10, and seeks methods to ensure balanced results. Suggestions include using matrix inversion for load calculations and employing space frame software for accuracy. Additionally, profile sizing should consider tension, compression, and buckling potential, with an emphasis on reducing section sizes for efficiency. The importance of understanding load transfer and the implications of plastic design in steel structures is also highlighted.
Gunter1977
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Frame members
I'm with a home study structural engineering as an electrical engineer. The assignment that I am trying to do is calculating a frame to support a large pipe with a weight of 32,000 kN distributed across eight legs. ( so it on a job site) I've performed a detailed analysis of the forces using free-body diagrams and resolved the components for each member, as shown in the attached PDF. However,

I have encountered challenges in achieving consistent results across all members, particularly in balancing the sum of forces and moments. For instance, while I've determined the axial force in member M20 to be 5072 kN,

I'm struggling to achieve the same consistency for member M10.

Questions:
1. Method for Resolving Forces:
How should I approach ensuring consistent results across all members? Are there specific methods or techniques I should consider to balance the forces and moments effectively?

2. Determining Profile Sizes: What factors should I consider when determining the sizes of profiles (beams)? Is it primarily based on considerations of tension, compression, or potential for buckling under load? I appreciate any insights or guidance on these issues. Thank you!

Thank you in advance,
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and berkeman
Engineering news on Phys.org
1. Consider solving the loads as a matrix inversion, rather than sequentially, individually. Use space frame software.

2. Refine the design by changing, (preferably reducing), the sections based on tension, compression, and column stability (buckling).

What gives? Plastic design of steel structures, allows the material to bend when first installed. Do you want the pipe or the supporting frames to deform first? By designing the frames to deform, until the load is cradled in the structure, there will be significant savings in weight and cost.
 
I believe that the free body diagram is very far from reality, as the lateral forces are non-existing, unless an external horizontal force is acting on the tank.

The only external forces acting on the support are the equally divided weight, acting solely in a vertical direction.
How the different members transfer those loads to the ground is a different matter.

Therefore, the represented four blue vectors seem to be incorrect.

Tank support.jpg
 
Last edited:
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K