Resultant forces of coplanar systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the magnitude of force F in a coplanar system where the resultant of three forces passes through point O. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the resultant force's relationship to moments around point O, suggesting the use of Varignon's theorem. The problem is clarified as not necessarily being in equilibrium, which affects the approach to finding F. Despite attempts to sum forces and resolve components, the correct answer is identified as 19.9 kN, highlighting the need to focus on the resultant force's definition and its implications for moments. The conversation underscores the complexity of analyzing forces in non-equilibrium systems.
SUCRALOSE
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Determine the magnitude of F if the resultant of the three forces passes through point O.

Homework Equations



ƩFx = 0
ƩFy = 0
ƩM = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



The most I can come up with is that the two forces on the left would equal F on the right, and trying to ratio the force and distance it still does not work.

Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 592
  • Like
Likes Jacob Sigging
Physics news on Phys.org
540 views and no one person on here can even throw a simple hint my way... I am at a loss as to why. I read the rules and have done everything instructed. What's the deal here?
 
Last edited:
Can you explain the diagram a bit. Is it some rigid structure that is in equilibrium?
 
If it's in equilibrium, I think you can sum up moments at O and resolve F to its x and y components and find the moment due to each component. Or you could just sum up forces along x and y to 0 (but since there's no angle I think you should use the moment method).

**Just noticed you need the resultant force.. I think you should use Varignon's theorem.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies,

The question states, "determine the magnitude of the vertical force F if the resultant of the three forces acting on the crank passes through the bearing O."

So if it's a crank and the resultant is passing through a bearing then it is not in equilibrium, I am assuming.

I have tried summing the forces on the right side and converting that into it's x & y coordinates, but that does not work. I have worked out all angles and have tried lots, but nothing has worked.

The answer is 19.9 kN, just can seem to find out how to get to that.
 
You're right, its not necessarily in equilibrium. Luckily, you don't need to know if its in equilibrium to answer the question. The key is in the definition of the resultant force (which I just looked up to try to get my head round it). The question says that the resultant force passes through O, so what does this tell us about the sum of the moments around O?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top