Reviewing statics and came across this problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the behavior of a beam with a pin and roller connection under applied moments and forces. It highlights the contradiction that while a moment at the pin causes the entire beam to rotate, the roller end does not experience this moment when the beam is sectioned. The key insight is that when the beam is treated as a whole, all parts can "see" the couple moment, but once a section is isolated, it may not experience the same moment due to its internal properties. The placement of the couple moment on the beam significantly influences the internal moments and stresses of the section. Ultimately, this understanding clarifies how internal forces and moments interact within structural analysis.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
Im reviewing statics and came across this problem. There is a beam pin connected at one end and roller connected on the other. There is a moment at the pin and a force somewhere along the beam. Then they section it to find the internal normal shear and moment. One of the things i found slightly contraditory was that the moment can act anywhere along the beam. It causes the whole beam to rotate. But when the section the end where the roller is, they have to leave off the moment. This makes sense, I understand what there doing. The contradition seems to be that this end does not see the moment cuase where the pin is. Yet at the same time the moment at the pin causes the entire beam to rotate.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think I figure it out. When you have the entire beam, all parts can "see" the couple moment because it is a free vector. When you section off a portion of the beam, it can no longer "see" the couple moment. This does not mean that this section does not want to roate in the direction of the moment anymore. It still does, when you reconnect it with the rest of the beam. But once you chop it off, it "sees" a different moment acting on it, or possibly no moment, and this due strictly to the internal moment of the section itself. The couple is a free vector, so if u do choose to place it where the section is, then in this case it will now act on the section, and you will get a different internal moment. So even though the couple is a free vector that can act anywhere on the beam, its placement on the beam DOES have an affect on the internal moments and stresses of that section.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top