RGB Tristimulus Graph: Negative Red Values Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyb3rGlitch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Cyb3rGlitch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm just trying to get my head around the RGB tristimulus graph, as follows:

[URL]http://cnx.org/content/m18092/latest/trist.png[/URL]

Why are there negative values for red? What does it mean?

I'd appreciate it if someone could help. And no, this isn't a homework question, it's part of my Computer Graphics course notes, and I'm having trouble understanding this particular concept.

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Refer to a http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/images/gamut/ciechart.jpg" .
'Pure' wavelengths are the convex edge of the diagram. So the tristimulus values (435.8nm, 546nm, 700nm) are three points on this edge, and the colors they can represent are the points inside that triangle. Not every color is inside it, which is why you can have negative values.

Note that the chart itself isn't really accurate for this reason. And your computer monitor only displays an even smaller gamut (see e.g. http://jkphoto.net/attach/1/1292499025.jpg" image showing some common color spaces)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top