Rolling ball down a slope, how to find final velocity?

AI Thread Summary
To find the final velocity of a ball rolling down a rough hill, one must consider the work done by friction and the conservation of energy principles. The ball experiences both translational and rotational motion, with friction affecting its acceleration and energy loss. The energy lost to friction complicates the calculations, as it does not act uniformly along the distance traveled. The torque on the ball, derived from the gravitational force and friction, plays a crucial role in determining the relationship between translational and rotational energies. Understanding these dynamics is essential for solving the problem accurately.
woodie37
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball is rolled down a rough hill with coefficient of \mu<tan\theta. The hill has a height of h. The ball has moment of inertia of I, mass of m, and radius of r, which are all constant. What is the final velocity of the ball at the bottom of the hill?

P.S. I made this question up, so I can't find an answer anywhere except from physics experts =D

Homework Equations


W = \DeltaK + \DeltaU where W is the work done by friction, K is the kinetic energy and U is potential energy.


The Attempt at a Solution



As the ball rolls down the hill it slips due to the fact that the frictional force is not strong enough. From an FBD, gravitational force acts on its center, and frictional force rotates the ball a little bit but the ball slips at a constant rate of slippage (idk if that's the right word).

As the ball is accelerated down wards by gravity, the frictional force decelerates the ball such that it slows down the gravitational acceleration and slightly rotates the ball...

and I have no idea how to do this...I attempted it and got an answer slightly greater than if the friction is strong enough to prevent slippage, where no energy is lost to friction.

Can someone help me solve this please? lol
 
Physics news on Phys.org
woodie37 said:

Homework Statement


A ball is rolled down a rough hill with coefficient of \mu<tan\theta. The hill has a height of h. The ball has moment of inertia of I, mass of m, and radius of r, which are all constant. What is the final velocity of the ball at the bottom of the hill?

P.S. I made this question up, so I can't find an answer anywhere except from physics experts =D

Homework Equations


W = \DeltaK + \DeltaU where W is the work done by friction, K is the kinetic energy and U is potential energy.


The Attempt at a Solution



As the ball rolls down the hill it slips due to the fact that the frictional force is not strong enough. From an FBD, gravitational force acts on its center, and frictional force rotates the ball a little bit but the ball slips at a constant rate of slippage (idk if that's the right word).

As the ball is accelerated down wards by gravity, the frictional force decelerates the ball such that it slows down the gravitational acceleration and slightly rotates the ball...

and I have no idea how to do this...I attempted it and got an answer slightly greater than if the friction is strong enough to prevent slippage, where no energy is lost to friction.

Can someone help me solve this please? lol
What is the energy lost to friction? What is the torque on the ball? How do you relate that torque and the distance traveled to the rotational energy of the ball? How does the lost energy + rotational energy + translational energy relate to the change in gravitational potential energy?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
What is the energy lost to friction? What is the torque on the ball? How do you relate that torque and the distance traveled to the rotational energy of the ball? How does the lost energy + rotational energy + translational energy relate to the change in gravitational potential energy?

AM

The energy lost due to friction is quite complicated to solve for, because as the ball slides down the hill of length h/sin\theta, it friction does NOT act on the ball for that length and instead the force of friction acts on the ball for a distance of h/sin\theta less the distance the ball turns while rolling downhill. The torque is the product of the parrallel force and the radius of the ball less the force of friction that needs to be added to ensure the ball does not slip, which in other words, is the the product of friction and radius of the ball, r, and the torque is constant, as the force of gravity does not change, and the coefficient of friction does not either. I know how to relate the different energies by the conservation of energy, but that can only be done when the other things have been related, which are stated above, which I don't know how to do...help please!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top