Rolling Hoop - Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a hoop that slides with backspin and eventually rolls back after reversing direction due to friction. Participants are trying to determine the speed of the hoop as it rolls back, considering the conservation of angular momentum and the effects of friction. There is confusion about how to mathematically express the total angular momentum and whether the point of slip and roll is significant. One participant conducted a practical experiment with a hoop and noted that it does not return with the same angular or translational speed, suggesting that friction affects both movements. The thread highlights the complexity of the problem and the need for a clearer understanding of the dynamics involved.
cardioid
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hoop is launched so that it slides with backspin across the floor. Due to friction on the floor, the hoop eventually reverses direction. A little after that, it stops slipping and rolls back to the point where it was launched. If the initial speed of the hoop was v and its initial angular velocity was omega, what is its speed as it rolls back?

Homework Equations



L = Iw + mvr
Iw = Iw for conservation

The Attempt at a Solution



L = Iw - mvr (I thought "-" because of friction). I need to find the total angular momentum of the hoop with respect to a stationary point on the floor, but I am not sure how to do this mathematically. The angular momentum with respect to the hoop rolling back has to equal the angular momentum with friction making it slip away. Is the point of slip/roll significant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't follow your description. I would except the hoop to stop moving forward, then reverse direction because of the backspin. In that case, the hoop would lose no angular momentum until the forward motion stopped.
So it would begin its return trip with the same angular velocity it started.

Of course, I might be misreading the situation.
 
What you say makes sense I think... I went out and found a hoop, and tried this on a flat road, and the hoop does not roll back with the same angular or translational motion... so I'm not sure
 
I think you could be right. If there's friction slowing the translational movement, it must be slowing the angular movement also.

I tried to work it out but it's not specific enough, or I'm too tired.
 
Well the problem is asking for a symbolic answer.. and that's all I have
 
still need help if anyone is interested,

also, thank you for replying Mentz
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top