Rolling Without Slipping/Loop Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mburt3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small, solid sphere rolling without slipping down a slope and through a loop-the-loop. The objective is to determine the minimum height from which the sphere must start to complete the loop, considering its mass, radius, and the geometry of the track.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the inclusion of rotational kinetic energy in energy conservation equations and question how to incorporate rotational velocity into their calculations.
  • Some participants suggest using force balance equations to derive relationships between forces and motion at the top of the loop.
  • There is a debate about whether the normal force at the top of the loop can be considered zero and its implications for the calculations.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the relevance of the sphere's radius in relation to the loop's radius.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on using energy conservation and force balance equations, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of rotational motion and energy conservation, with some noting that the radius of the sphere may not be negligible compared to the loop's radius. There is also mention of homework constraints and the need for clarity in the equations used.

mburt3
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small, solid sphere of mass 0.6kg and radius 27 cm rolls without slipping along the track consisting of slope (at an angle of 60degrees from horizontal) and loop-the-loop with radius 2.65m at the end of the slope. It starts from rest near the top of the track at a height, h, where h is large compared to 27 cm. What is the minimum value of h such that the sphere completes the loop?


Homework Equations


mgh=1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iw^2
mv^2/r=mg
1/2mv(top)^2 + mgr2 = 1/2mv(bottom)^2 + 0


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for v at the top of the loop to be v=square root of (gR)
v(top)=5.096m/s

Then I used the equation 1/2mv(top)^2 + mgr2 = 1/2mv(bottom)^2 + 0
and solved for v at the bottom.
v(bottom)= 11.4 m/s
Then I plugged this into the equation: mgh=1/2mv(bottom)^2 + 1/2Iw^2
and simplified it to be
gh= v(bottom)^2 + 2/5v(bottom)^2
and solved for h to get 9.27 m.

Where did I mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to include rotational kinetic energy in all your energy conservation calculations.
 
can i still solve for the velocity at the top in the same way? If not, how would I incorporate rotational velocity into that?
 
Draw a FBD.

1) mg-Fn=ma=mv^2/R
2) mgh=mg(2R)+1/2mv^2+1/2Iw^2

then solve for h

I got h=27/10R
 
You haven't explained what that equation is.

If you obtained it by considering the motion of the center of mass alone, there is no need to include the rotational velocity. Remember, that is a force balance equation, not an energy conservation relation.
 
Yea I got 7.15 which is 27/10R, but I got it wrong on my online hw. Isn't it true that the force of normal reaction at the top of the loop is zero if it is just going fast enough to make it over. If so, wouldn't mg=mv^2/R.
 
naresh said:
You haven't explained what that equation is.

If you obtained it by considering the motion of the center of mass alone, there is no need to include the rotational velocity. Remember, that is a force balance equation, not an energy conservation relation.

huh? Don't you have to include rotational energy?


mburt3 said:
Yea I got 7.15 which is 27/10R, but I got it wrong on my online hw. Isn't it true that the force of normal reaction at the top of the loop is zero if it is just going fast enough to make it over. If so, wouldn't mg=mv^2/R.

I assumed that the Fn is zero, can't really expain why though. I'm sure that assuming it is zero correct, I did my problem from a textbook and the answer is the same as the textbook. (my question is just in general form)
 
Bright Wang said:
huh? Don't you have to include rotational energy?

My previous post just referred to the part about finding the velocity at the top. "That equation" referred to the force-balance equation that you wrote down.

Your solutions look fine to me. The only problem might be that the radius of the sphere is not really negligible in comparison to the radius of the loop. You might be expected to take that into account (?)
 
ok thanks for all of your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K