Rotational and collision problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mechanics problem involving a uniform disc and a particle striking it. Participants analyze the conservation of momentum and angular momentum to determine the initial velocity of the disc's center after the collision. There is a discrepancy between the calculated result of v/4 and the book's answer of 2v/5, leading to speculation about a possible error in the book's moment of inertia value. One contributor suggests that the authors may have intended a different orientation for the disc, which could explain the confusion. The book in question is "Further Mechanics and Probability" published by Stanley Thornes.
sunnypic143
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question I came across in mechanics book by Bostock Chandler
> A uniform disc, resting on a smooth horizontal table, has mass 'm', radius 'a' and centre C. A particle of mass 'm', moving across the table with speed 'v', strikes a point A on the circumference of the disc when traveling at right angles to AC. If the particle adheres to the disc, find the initial velocity of C.

Homework Equations


Both the particle and the disc have same mass, so after the event velocity of the common centre of mass will be v/2. thereafter applying conservation of angular momentum about the common center of mass i get the velocity of C as v/4, but the answer specified in the book is 2v/5. Where am i going wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sunnypic143! :smile:

yes, I applied conservation of angular momentum about A, and got the same result …

(v - 2w)/a ma2/2 = maw, so v - 2w = 2w.

it looks as if the book has used 2ma2 for the moment of inertia of a disc, instead of ma2/2 … v - 2w = w/2. :confused:

Is this is the latest edition of the book? Maybe a later one has a correction (and which book by Bostock and Chandler is it)?​
 
hey tim thanks 4 the replyo:)

this is exactly what i thought!

but i have gr8 respect for the authors, probably they implied a different orientation of the disc
say xz plane(if we assume table to be xy) and the particle travels along y axis

or something else like that and they failed to convey it properly
if anything else occurs to you be sure to reply
i wouldn't buy that the authors took moment of inertia as 2ma^2. Sounds too dumb of them if they did.:rolleyes: Anyway thanx:approve:

Btw the book is 'further mechanics and probablity' published by stanley thornes
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top