Rotational and collision problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mechanics problem involving a uniform disc and a particle striking it. Participants analyze the conservation of momentum and angular momentum to determine the initial velocity of the disc's center after the collision. There is a discrepancy between the calculated result of v/4 and the book's answer of 2v/5, leading to speculation about a possible error in the book's moment of inertia value. One contributor suggests that the authors may have intended a different orientation for the disc, which could explain the confusion. The book in question is "Further Mechanics and Probability" published by Stanley Thornes.
sunnypic143
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question I came across in mechanics book by Bostock Chandler
> A uniform disc, resting on a smooth horizontal table, has mass 'm', radius 'a' and centre C. A particle of mass 'm', moving across the table with speed 'v', strikes a point A on the circumference of the disc when traveling at right angles to AC. If the particle adheres to the disc, find the initial velocity of C.

Homework Equations


Both the particle and the disc have same mass, so after the event velocity of the common centre of mass will be v/2. thereafter applying conservation of angular momentum about the common center of mass i get the velocity of C as v/4, but the answer specified in the book is 2v/5. Where am i going wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sunnypic143! :smile:

yes, I applied conservation of angular momentum about A, and got the same result …

(v - 2w)/a ma2/2 = maw, so v - 2w = 2w.

it looks as if the book has used 2ma2 for the moment of inertia of a disc, instead of ma2/2 … v - 2w = w/2. :confused:

Is this is the latest edition of the book? Maybe a later one has a correction (and which book by Bostock and Chandler is it)?​
 
hey tim thanks 4 the replyo:)

this is exactly what i thought!

but i have gr8 respect for the authors, probably they implied a different orientation of the disc
say xz plane(if we assume table to be xy) and the particle travels along y axis

or something else like that and they failed to convey it properly
if anything else occurs to you be sure to reply
i wouldn't buy that the authors took moment of inertia as 2ma^2. Sounds too dumb of them if they did.:rolleyes: Anyway thanx:approve:

Btw the book is 'further mechanics and probablity' published by stanley thornes
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top