Rotational Dynamics of a Handle with a Knob on One End

  • Thread starter Thread starter judonight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Rotating
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the rotational dynamics of a rod with a knob, focusing on the velocity and acceleration at the top and bottom of the knob. The main inquiry is whether the velocity and acceleration differ between these two points due to their respective distances from the origin. The user seeks clarification on whether the velocity is calculated using the radius in the x-y plane or if the height of the knob in the z-axis affects the calculations. The question emphasizes the need for assistance in understanding these concepts. Overall, the user is looking for a straightforward explanation of the dynamics involved.
judonight
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
No responses, so let me change the question...

A rotating (in x-y plane) rod about one of it's ends.

At the other end, from the origin, is a knob with height into the z axis.

What is the velocity and acceleration at the top of the knob?

Is the velocity and acceleration at the top of the knob different than at the bottom?

Is it radius (in x-y plane, distance from origin) times omega = velocity

Or is the magnitude of radius need for origin to top of knob?

TIA!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Still not sure what to do...
 
Updated question... please help, it's a simple question.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top